Dizzy bowled pretty well in the 1st innings so did Kasper, if Macgill had played he would have been slaughtered i'm pretty sure.Shane Warne said:Compared to Gillespie?![]()
I question your sanity.
Now I REALLY question your sanity.aussie said:Dizzy bowled pretty well in the 1st innings .
wait your saying you didn't see any improvement in Dizzy's bowling at all in the 1st innings????Shane Warne said:Now I REALLY question your sanity.
Gillespie has looked pedestrian all tour.
Improvement from awful to average at best.aussie said:wait your saying you didn't see any improvement in Dizzy's bowling at all in the 1st innings????
Exactly.chalky said:Gillespie is bowling medium pace rubbish. as an England fan I wish he could bowl from both ends
Nothing to worry about at all.superkingdave said:another wicket before the end of the day to stop me from being nervous, preferrably Clarke
a bit more than average for me, so you reckon Macgill could have made much of a difference to Australia's bowling attack???Shane Warne said:Improvement from awful to average at best.
Yes.aussie said:a bit more than average for me, so you reckon Macgill could have made much of a difference to Australia's bowling attack???
well i disagree, and this argument ends here......Shane Warne said:Yes.
A huge difference.
Don't be ricockulous.Sanz said:Another 13 runs by these two and I will put Aus-Eng 50:50.