PY
International Coach
Don't say that, he'll do it all by himself.luckyeddie said:He'll have to do it on his own, because frankly on current form he's the only Australian bowler on show who would get into the England side.
Don't say that, he'll do it all by himself.luckyeddie said:He'll have to do it on his own, because frankly on current form he's the only Australian bowler on show who would get into the England side.
I'm going to check the odds at the bookies on Warney getting a tenfer. If I can get 100-1 I'll have a tenner on it.PY said:Don't say that, he'll do it all by himself.
The difference is the time, for God's sake. If you have 7 minutes left when a wicket falls, you don't go off because there's plenty of time to finish the over and maybe bowl another. If there's 2 minutes left, you go off.Scaly piscine said:There weren't that many and that over was the last, there's no difference except for one being lunch and one being the end of play.
I recognise your ugly mug from the avatar, as the happy clappy moron who had the misfortune of being turded by me earlier.steds said:Yeah, old lardarse could have had a field day in three days time, but he won't be, so there's no need to even think about it
It wasn't seven minutes. If you look at the times on here when people posted you'll see it wasn't.Beleg said:In seven minutes, you can usually cover two overs. It takes around 2 minutes for change of player. That would give five minutes for the rest of the balls to be bowled without going into over-time.
That wasn't possible before lunch, where you'd be going into overtime if you completed the over.
I might do actually, or at least taking 7 or more wickets (someone has to bowl at the other end).luckyeddie said:I'm going to check the odds at the bookies on Warney getting a tenfer. If I can get 100-1 I'll have a tenner on it.
What difference does it make? He wasn't out. Hoggard probably gets paid by the hour on his tenure at the crease anyway - so when they start play tomorrow, he'll have already had the meter running for 17 hours.Scaly piscine said:There weren't that many and that over was the last, there's no difference except for one being lunch and one being the end of play.
where do you check for that Scaly??Scaly piscine said:It wasn't seven minutes. If you look at the times on here when people posted you'll see it wasn't.
I'd take that over being on the bad end of the LBW decisions, any day.Scaly piscine said:I'd say more like an idiot, can't even cover his stumps. I notice when England got a wicket before lunch they went for lunch, Australia get a wicket the same amount of time before the end of play and they stay on. Is it some rule or is it just more blatant pro Aussie bias... ?
Oh dear plastic bag, does it matter? Hoggard survived the four balls and England are effectively 124 for 1, with Vaughan, Pietersen and Flintoff still to come. I'll take that after two days cricket.Scaly piscine said:It wasn't seven minutes. If you look at the times on here when people posted you'll see it wasn't.
I am going by the cricinfo commentary,It wasn't seven minutes. If you look at the times on here when people posted you'll see it wasn't.
Even if we deduct a minute for the first ball and the time it took to compute the information on the website, we are still left with at least five minutes. Deducting two minutes will give us 180 seconds, which are more than enough for four balls by a spinner.Warne into the attack now, just about seven minutes left in the
day, possibly two overs
Compare the times when people posted on here and said so and so was out (I realise so and so might have given the run out as out a little earlier than it took the 3rd umpire to give it), I know it doesn't make any difference, I'm just proving I'm right is all...aussie said:where do you check for that Scaly??
I suggest you stop this line of posting now.Shane Warne said:I recognise your ugly mug from the avatar, as the happy clappy moron who had the misfortune of being turded by me earlier.
Mess with the bull young man, and you will get the horns. OK so you paid the price but learn from tangling with me and move on.
No need to make your lifes mission, following me around from thread to thread.
You're pedantic.Beleg said:Call me pedantic, but there are enough legitimate reasons already to accuse Umpires of bias without inventing some of your own.
Knowing England i think with the exception of KP when the rest of the English batting line-up see the spin out their from Warne tomoro they will play him defensively thus playing right into Shane's hands which is exactly what i wanttooextracool said:i'd be extremely interested to see how england go about batting tomorrow, whether they bat with the same recklessness as they did on day 1 or whether they try to defend warne, but i hope to death that they decide to play him aggressively.
im not going to bother with that but just on topic, i think i saw the worst appeal ever recently by zaheer khan against the WI. somebody should tell him that a ball pitching outside leg and hitting the batsmen outside leg stump is not outShane Warne said:Because he isn't as good, Giles actually has more ridiculous appeals than both, when it's pitched outside leg, going past the stumps and hit the middle of the bat outside the line.