marc71178
Eyes not spreadsheets
Like they did on Pietersen?aussie said:Joyce seems good but he will be inexperienced & Australia could prey on that key fact.
Like they did on Pietersen?aussie said:Joyce seems good but he will be inexperienced & Australia could prey on that key fact.
Jones is a liability and we cannot afford to have him in the team against quality opposition, against lesser sides his errors are less important. TBH I haven't seen Read bat in a long time so he may have improved, but his test showing was far from encouraging. So yes, perhaps Prior is the answer, do you have any better suggestions?aussie said:So you reckon Prior could do both aspects better than Jones & Read, i think not........
Pietersen played a number of ODIs against Australia, with success, so Joyce would be a completely different case.marc71178 said:Like they did on Pietersen?
TBH, I don't think England will change thier squad either - with the exception of Pietersen, and to a lesser extent Bell and Tremlett, that side to face Australia in the first test was effectively the same side that had been so successful over 2004 and early 2005.Pedro Delgado said:Jones is a liability and we cannot afford to have him in the team against quality opposition, against lesser sides his errors are less important. TBH I haven't seen Read bat in a long time so he may have improved, but his test showing was far from encouraging. So yes, perhaps Prior is the answer, do you have any better suggestions?
FWIW I don't think a single change will be made to the England 12.
No, but if Edgebaston sees a copied performance by Jones he's surely out of the team. All it takes is a top-order drop...Somerset said:TBH, I don't think England will change thier squad either - with the exception of Pietersen, and to a lesser extent Bell and Tremlett, that side to face Australia in the first test was effectively the same side that had been so successful over 2004 and early 2005.
I dunno. Fletch likes him, he's made these errors intermittently (I'm being generous there) throughout, and he's still #1. It's very difficult to "get dropped" from this England team.Steulen said:No, but if Edgebaston sees a copied performance by Jones he's surely out of the team. All it takes is a top-order drop...
I would hope that it would take more than that.No, but if Edgebaston sees a copied performance by Jones he's surely out of the team. All it takes is a top-order drop...
marc71178 said:Like they did on Pietersen?
All I can say is no wonder Queensland didn't want him lol.Top_Cat said:I would hope that it would take more than that.
Anyway, he's still batting well and aside from a massive form drop with the gloves, it's pretty unlikely the selectors will drop a keeper mid-series. Certainly pretty rare in English or Australian circles.
Thing is, his normal wk-standard is so below par.Top_Cat said:I would hope that it would take more than that.
Anyway, he's still batting well and aside from a massive form drop with the gloves, it's pretty unlikely the selectors will drop a keeper mid-series. Certainly pretty rare in English or Australian circles.
True, point that.tooextracool said:i think that was expected though. whenever australia do lose the ashes they are gonna cop a hell of a lot from both the english press and the australian press.
yeah that is probably going to be the way, chairman of selectors Graveney said he is not going to panic, after all, it is only the first test played at the Aussies Away ground so it is not bad enough to start tampering with the current outfitjordyh said:I really doubt that any changes will be made
When he gets his customary duck at Edgebaston, he will still have a batting average of 30 for the seriesirfan said:Vaughan 3,4
Bell 6,8
Flintoff 0,3 (4-183)
Total 24 runs
McGrath 10*,20* (9-82)
Total 30*
its a worrying sign when 3 in ure top 6 gets comprehensively beaten by McGrath..........................................with the bat!
I think he was joking. In fact I know he is joking. Stands to reason.marc71178 said:Even though they put on 80 in the 2nd innings?
He said 3 in the top 6, not the top 3.marc71178 said:Even though they put on 80 in the 2nd innings?
Completely agree.FaaipDeOiad said:Collingwood shouldn't play test cricket. He's just not a good enough batsman. England have a lot of better options, and I'd rather see Joyce, Key, Butcher or any number of other people before Collingwood.