Way to give the opposition credit there. England didn't get a wicket for an hour and a half after tea because they "waited".Scaly piscine said:Now why did England have to wait til over an hour and a half after a tea before this?
The way that ball moved & bounced almost makes it look even worse for England.
he never really doesKing_Ponting said:Not really unlucky for martyn as he didnt move his feet
Nope, about as plumb as you can get.Slow Love™ said:Martyn looked completely plumb to me. Does anybody think otherwise?
Not me mate. but i suggest a visit to the optometrist if anyone does beg to differ.Slow Love™ said:Martyn looked completely plumb to me. Does anybody think otherwise?
Well Clarke nearly got himself out in the 20s but Pietersen put down an easy catch, other than that Australia get credit for taking the ample opportunities for scoring - otherwise their lives were made far easier by 9 overs of Giles and other bowlers you'd be fairly comfortable against early on - compared to Flintoff and Harmison.FaaipDeOiad said:Way to give the opposition credit there. England didn't get a wicket for an hour and a half after tea because they "waited".