this comming from a guy, whose team lost 5-0 to SL...in England. LOLmarc71178 said:If SL could play all their games at home, then maybe...
Hmmm you know what this is quite a good example that you gave .There is a thing called "standard" and maintaining it is the main problem . Pakistan can beat Australia , England did that too but how many times?dinu23 said:this comming from a guy, whose team lost 5-0 to SL...in England. LOL
In test cricket, the only blemish so far is really the Ashes. Outside of that series, Australia has been virtually flawless in test cricket for several years. Since the series win in India for instance, Australia has won 16 tests, drawn 4 and lost 2. Take out the Ashes and it's 15 wins and 2 draws, with no losses. That includes series against South Africa, Pakistan, New Zealand, West Indies and Bangladesh, so a fair cross-section of world cricket. I don't think there's much evidence there of a clear decay in the team as a whole, so much as one series where a number of problems with the team came to a head. If those problems can be rectified, there's no reason Australia can't continue to dominate in test cricket for a couple more seasons at least. There will inevitably be a decline when some of the current greats move on (Warne, McGrath, Gilchrist etc), but I don't think it's necessarily something that is happening right now.Run like Inzy said:I dont see a team surpassing the great aussie team of the last decade in the near future, but the decline of the Aussie team is apparent and with an ageing team it is more likely that the others don't catch up but infact the Aussies fall behind.
May be Hare will slow down but this hare seems not to be "sleeping atleast" any time in the future for sure.SJS said:The tortoise never runs fast. Its just that it lives much, MUCH longer than the hare.
The hare will finally slow down with age.
Yes I agree.FRAZ said:May be Hare will slow down but this hare seems not to be "sleeping atleast" any time in the future for sure.
I can't argue with your stats, but I just wonder if Aus' batting lineup has got away with it a bit in recent years due to the weakness of bowling attacks elsewhere. Obviously I'm not saying they have a bad top 7, but I'm not convinced it's what it was when both Waughs were playing, and I'm not sure that Gilchrist is as good as he was. As for the bowling, you'd have to say that there's not as much quality beyond the two all-time-greats as when Gillespie was still a world class performer.FaaipDeOiad said:In test cricket, the only blemish so far is really the Ashes. Outside of that series, Australia has been virtually flawless in test cricket for several years. Since the series win in India for instance, Australia has won 16 tests, drawn 4 and lost 2. Take out the Ashes and it's 15 wins and 2 draws, with no losses. That includes series against South Africa, Pakistan, New Zealand, West Indies and Bangladesh, so a fair cross-section of world cricket. I don't think there's much evidence there of a clear decay in the team as a whole, so much as one series where a number of problems with the team came to a head. If those problems can be rectified, there's no reason Australia can't continue to dominate in test cricket for a couple more seasons at least. There will inevitably be a decline when some of the current greats move on (Warne, McGrath, Gilchrist etc), but I don't think it's necessarily something that is happening right now.
I think Test cricket has rarely been more competitive. What are you talking about? Yes Zim and Bang aren't competitive, and WI are in a down cycle...but for the most part I've never seen this many close tests.SJS said:I think the Australians are being made to last FOREVER by stagnant, even declining, overall standards. With the gap there was to start with, its not surprising is it.
Doesn't mean the standard's high though. Just means there's a lot of moderate sides that are quite evenly matched.silentstriker said:I think Test cricket has rarely been more competitive. What are you talking about? Yes Zim and Bang aren't competitive, and WI are in a down cycle...but for the most part I've never seen this many close tests.
Perfect.wpdavid said:Doesn't mean the standard's high though. Just means there's a lot of moderate sides that are quite evenly matched.