You're joking right? Get rid of Australia's best ever ODI player! That's insane.mefly said:he should stay opening, and should replace katich in ODI, also jacgues opening and gilly in the middle order, instead of Roy
I can't believe Hopes isn't playing in this game. He & Cosgrove should have played.oz_fan said:Was there any need to play a fifth bowler when we have Symonds and Clarke who could have bowled the 10 overs between them? Cosgrove should have been in the team before Johnson.
You could be justified in saying that Symonds wasn't consistent in his short test career, but you cannot say that about his ODI career since the 2003 World Cup. His big centuries have usually come when early wickets have fallen. He is the most destructive middle order batsman in ODI cricket, the best fielder in the world and his bowling is more than adequate in ODIs.mefly said:yeah he is really inconsistant too much for my liking, 0(6) is not good enough for a middle order batsman named andrew symonds against bangladesh not good enough
I agree with you - and the stats support it...Mister Wright said:You could be justified in saying that Symonds wasn't consistent in his short test career, but you cannot say that about his ODI career since the 2003 World Cup. His big centuries have usually come when early wickets have fallen. He is the most destructive middle order batsman in ODI cricket, the best fielder in the world and his bowling is more than adequate in ODIs.
Yep since 2004 Symonds has averaged 44 and scored 3 centuries and 12 fifties at a strike rate in the mid nineties.Mister Wright said:You could be justified in saying that Symonds wasn't consistent in his short test career, but you cannot say that about his ODI career since the 2003 World Cup. His big centuries have usually come when early wickets have fallen. He is the most destructive middle order batsman in ODI cricket, the best fielder in the world and his bowling is more than adequate in ODIs.
Yep it's good to see them on the improve. They have really performed against the Aussies and pushed them all the way during the series.sirjeremy11 said:If Bangladesh can get a couple of decent batsmen, they will really become a tricky ODI side at home.
I love it.
So did I. Surely by now they would realise that Katich isn't suited to opening. Cosgrove should have been given a go.GoT_SpIn said:I though the crap decisions would end with Hohns leaving
Indubiably.oz_fan said:So did I. Surely by now they would realise that Katich isn't suited to opening. Cosgrove should have been given a go.
Is he still in Bangladesh? I would have thought he has come homeGoT_SpIn said:Indubiably.
God knows why jaques was ignored after his 94, where he was wrongly given out. And atleast give the donut man a chance against Bangladesh
I think he might have. Im just saying, why the hell isnt he still there.pasag said:Is he still in Bangladesh? I would have thought he has come home
I got that feeling as well. Clarke looks like he is always trying really hard to get a run, while Symonds just chips it into a gapThe contrast between Symonds and Clarke is interesting, Symonds just seems to exude confidence and you really get the feeling he can take the side to a big score, where as Clarke doesn't seem to coping anywhere near aswell.