TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
No, you've got that backwardsSure, but Warner was more pivotal. Could have won with other spinners (with more difficulty, of course), couldn't without Warner.
No, you've got that backwardsSure, but Warner was more pivotal. Could have won with other spinners (with more difficulty, of course), couldn't without Warner.
Doesn't make up for their top order thoughNothing compared to England's. Their tail is ridiculously long, ridiculously good and ridiculously annoying!
I swear our tail is always decent on paper but collectively kind of suckOur tail should be v decent at home though. Starc/Pattinson/Cummins are all 20+ averaging tailenders.
Would prefer a tail that puts the finishing touches at 5/250 rather than bailing the side out from 5/100 thoughNothing compared to England's. Their tail is ridiculously long, ridiculously good and ridiculously annoying!
It hasn't been that good on paper for a while tbh. Hazlewood + Bird + Lyon are kind of deadweights.I swear our tail is always decent on paper but collectively kind of suck
Lyon's batting has gone from handy No 11 to outright bunny in last 15 months; averages around 6.5 since start of Sri Lanka series last year.It hasn't been that good on paper for a while tbh. Hazlewood + Bird + Lyon are kind of deadweights.
This has really annoyed me lately. At first he was a handy blocker, ~15 average tailender very similar to Jason Gillespie. Then he decided he wanted to be a slogger instead so started slogging a lot more and still made about the same but quicker. Now he's just useless at everything.Lyon's batting has gone from handy No 11 to outright bunny in last 15 months; averages around 6.5 since start of Sri Lanka series last year.
Anderson syndrome.This has really annoyed me lately. At first he was a handy blocker, ~15 average tailender very similar to Jason Gillespie. Then he decided he wanted to be a slogger instead so started slogging a lot more and still made about the same but quicker. Now he's just useless at everything.
Shafiul -1 - Totally useless and negative marking for dropping CumminsTamin 6.5 - one excellent Test where his innings were the difference, one poor one. Still that's enough for a passing mark in a two-Test series.
Sarkar 3 - made a start, but like Renshaw didn't do much else. I don't rate him from what I've seen.
Kayes 1 - simply not good enough. Needs to be opening again, and probably on his last chance as a Test cricketer.
Sabbir 5 - one 50, and not much else. That 24 was one of the worst 24's I've ever seen.
Shakib 8.5 - dominant first Test, average second one. Still probably Bangladesh's best player in the series though.
Mushfiqur 6 - batted well, kept poorly. Got better as the series went on.
Nasir Hossain 4.5 - made some contributions, but nothing really significant. Think he's best served in the role that he played at Chittagong.
Mehidy 6 - like a few Bangladeshis he was good at Dhaka but off the boil at Chittagong. Overall a mixed series and gets a mixed kind of score.
Taijul 5 - the third wheel and didn't do all that much of note. Wasn't that bad though.
Shafiul 3 - did nothing of note. Was useless in the conditions.
Mustafizur 7 - very good second Test, but was quiet in the first (the inverse of a lot of his team-mates). Terribad with the bat too.
Mominul 5 - looked composed without making a huge contribution in his one Test. Why he was initially dropped I don't understand.
Financially CA would lose money so thats their reluctance to host, cricket wise if the pitches are on the flatter side BD batsmen could score some runs and raise their profile overseas I thinkI hope Bangladesh tour here soon. I really enjoyed this series, far more than I thought I would. CA has treated Bangladesh terribly over the years, particularly cancelling home series and not giving them a shot at a series here in so long.
It seems like Warner is forever pushing the rock up the hill to convince people to trust his skill. From the time Hilditch tried to ruin his career and typecast him as a T20 specialist right through to the unbalanced emphasis on his sub con record to talk down his overall value. I remember when I first saw him thinking he could be like an opening version of Gilly and had more faith in the potential of his technique than say Phil Hughes.Anyway, series ratings:
Warner two tons is a very good result from him given I was willing to drop him after the first innings at Dhaka.