Originally posted by royGilchristThis also stops games being boring. Otherwise everyone would say "Australia are too good, lets give them 5 bouncers an over and see how they like it!!"But apparently that protection is not enough, so they are provided with further protection in the form of one bouncer per over or bpouncers no balled, type of rules.
Originally posted by royGilchristThis also stops games being boring. Otherwise everyone would say "Australia are too good, lets give them 5 bouncers an over and see how they like it!!"But apparently that protection is not enough, so they are provided with further protection in the form of one bouncer per over or bpouncers no balled, type of rules.
Originally posted by royGilchristThis also stops games being boring. Otherwise everyone would say "Australia are too good, lets give them 5 bouncers an over and see how they like it!!"But apparently that protection is not enough, so they are provided with further protection in the form of one bouncer per over or bpouncers no balled, type of rules.
Quite a silly thing to say really, were WI getting bounced incessantly (sp?) just because they were winning?This also stops games being boring. Otherwise everyone would say "Australia are too good, lets give them 5 bouncers an over and see how they like it!!"
What pattern?:O:OOriginally posted by Neil Pickup
Nah, I think Slater's international career's done - he wasn't even picked initially for this game untile Mark was injured. Steve's 19 off his last 4 balls was a little on the :O side for me..
Well.. positives.. Irani, Blackwell, Shah, Harmison. Add this to Key, Dawson and Jones in the tests and I'm seeing a pattern here.
No, actually if you had left them in then we would have enjoyed it more...on the wane...lalalaOriginally posted by anzac
as if dropping the twins wasn't being nice enough!!!!!!!
:P
No because they were both out of form anyway, England would have rather seen them in the team rather than having a inform player come in.Originally posted by anzac
as if dropping the twins wasn't being nice enough!!!!!!!
:P
Oh well we will just have to beat you at full strenght, just means you wont be able to borrow England's number 1 excuse :POriginally posted by anzac
awww sorry guys - no fun at all!!!!
just watch the Aus A v England ODI & then still tell us if you really think it would make any difference if even a couple of the 1st team got injured!!!!!
It's not just an excuse, it's a horrid reality. seriously, if any more players get injured then we might as well pull out as we've lost the Ashes and we would be better off actually having some fit players for the WC and beyond...Originally posted by Rich2001
Oh well we will just have to beat you at full strenght, just means you wont be able to borrow England's number 1 excuse :POriginally posted by anzac
awww sorry guys - no fun at all!!!!
just watch the Aus A v England ODI & then still tell us if you really think it would make any difference if even a couple of the 1st team got injured!!!!!
I agree, theres always enough players back at home to make a squad up.. even if it's not your 1st choice one.Originally posted by Mr Mxyzptlk
Pulling out is not the solution.