Declaring at 350 would have been a terrible optionEven if India get rolled, it will still likely be a draw as Australia will probably bat again, eat up more time. However if they enforce the follow-on after ind collapse, then Aus have a chance. There's 4-6 sessions left.
Odds
Aus 3.40
Draw 1.35
IMO Australia should have declared at 350/360 and taken a couple of tired Indian wickets last night to pile on the pressure on deflated India. Then try to run through them today. Instead they have gone for the safe option and I doubt there's gonna be any result now.
Yeah looking at the forecast today probably won’t be too bad, next two days don’t look great though.Offshore winds are blowing rain to the north
IF it stays this way, unlikely to have long delays as rain events are scattered and fast moving
Loading…
www.bom.gov.au
i'm normally quite pro follow on and think modern teams are soft bc of their reticence to use it but with four essentially back to back tests and australia's policy of not really resting quicks i'd be disinclined to go for it especially when the alternative is running more miles in to bumrah's legsEven if India get rolled, it will still likely be a draw as Australia will probably bat again, eat up more time. However if they enforce the follow-on after ind collapse, then Aus have a chance. There's 4-6 sessions left.
Indeed. Why wouldn't you score as many as you can as quickly as you can while you're on top rathe rhtan having to start over again in the second dig?Declaring at 350 would have been a terrible option
If that happened and they sacked their captain mid-tour, it would be a recipe for a pizzling wouldn't it? Very England late-80s/ early-90s areas.If Rohit bombs this game and the MCG one too, surely his place is untenable even as soon as Sydney? Guy's bad vibes allround atm. What player wants to look up and see his captain appear as frustrated as this crusty fvk does 90% of time.
Bumrah didn't bowl any overs in the last hour yesterday. And he only bowled 19 overs yesterday in 4 spells. India are using him sparingly. Not to mention there is a 8 day gap between this match and MCG. So putting miles in the legs will be more useful next match as MCG and SCG are back to back.i'm normally quite pro follow on and think modern teams are soft bc of their reticence to use it but with four essentially back to back tests and australia's policy of not really resting quicks i'd be disinclined to go for it especially when the alternative is running more miles in to bumrah's legs
Have to factor in it's at the **** hole though, and that makes bowling a lot harder.And he only bowled 19 overs yesterday in 4 spells
No downside to declaring at 350/360. Australia couldn't lose with around 5 sessions left in the match. But they could have gone hard at the tired Indian openers and had two cracks with the new ball. I wouldn't have been surprised if Australia had created a winning possibility out of that situation.Declaring at 350 would have been a terrible option
When there was 350 or so on the board there were closer to seven sessions left, three of them extended.No downside to declaring at 350/360. Australia couldn't lose with around 5 sessions left in the match. But they could have gone hard at the tired Indian openers and had two cracks with the new ball. I wouldn't have been surprised if Australia had created a winning possibility out of that situation.
They've also only passed 200 once in the series so far and their highest first innings score in their last 5 tests is about 250. The absence of Pujara or a Pujara-lite was always going to be massive in this series. They need someone to bat significant time up front asap or they won't win the series. Bumrah is a genius but you can't keep bowling to 150-200 first innings scores all the time. I mean, India won the last two series here because Aus couldn't put them away with the bat and it caught up with them.1-1 and India will be happy.
India hasn't lost at either MCG or SCG since 2011/12