I've watched Dupavillon for years as a Dolphins fan. I think he is a fine bowler but never considered him a pace merchant.Eathan Bosch (Also bats) and Baartman would get ahead of your seamers after 6 for me ..Swanepoel aswell
Dupavillon too for raw pace , I'd also be trying to get Maphaka in the set up as soon as possible
Well lets see if the SA batting can actually stand up... ability is there but not shown enough so far. But is this opportunity does not provide passion to really get ahead nothing will...Lol we're gonna blow another series win
The only reason we have been able to snag wins since the retirement of the batting stalwarts of the 2000s and early 2010s.As I said... genuine fast bowlers most other first teams would love coming out of our ears.
Hamza and Petersen with the most to play for.Well lets see if the SA batting can actually stand up... ability is there but not shown enough so far. But is this opportunity does not provide passion to really get ahead nothing will...
Well. You called him D, and the replies indicate you should have called him C. Don't beat yourself up too much ...Apologies for underrating him. Still not encouraging for our 6 (3 v India, 2 SL, 1 Afgh) tests in Asia this year.
He lost pace because of the injuries but it was great seeing him hit 145 and regularly over 140 in SA20. Only Burger & Williams did that more than him.I've watched Dupavillon for years as a Dolphins fan. I think he is a fine bowler but never considered him a pace merchant.
As a bowler, definitely better than Muthusamy. Linde is a difficult one, at his best he was very good... but does seem to have dropped off a bit recently. Piedt could have easily been first choice, its that close between them all... I think it was his poor subcontinent showing that pretty much ended his career a few years back.Well. You called him D, and the replies indicate you should have called him C. Don't beat yourself up too much ...
So, to Saffas. Is he higher rated than Linde? And Muthsamy?
Piedt was considered ahead them but could never nail his position for SA.Well. You called him D, and the replies indicate you should have called him C. Don't beat yourself up too much ...
So, to Saffas. Is he higher rated than Linde? And Muthsamy?
Wonder who would be consistently our quickest.As I said... genuine fast bowlers most other first teams would love coming out of our ears.
Anderson was touching 140 at 40 and has improved yearly since 35 or so.On Southee, Jimmy Anderson has shown it’s possible for that sort of bowler to enjoy late-career success, but apart from the fact that Tim isn’t quite the master he is he would probably need to give up white-ball cricket and completely focus on his craft.
In some ways he's the same player he was at 22Will Young is the most frustrating batsman - probably player, actually - of his generation. Was shafted for years in the way he was used, but has done nothing to raise a finger at the people who made those decisions.
Looks a zillion dollars, then finds any way to get out. That was a truly mud shot today from a guy with experience. Massively irresponsible
Yeah, I agree. If he makes it to the end of his Test career averaging under 30 without a hundred - which isn't inconceivable - it'll be the biggest waste of a talent for a long, long time.In some ways he's the same player he was at 22
Since Jesse imo. I put him in the Taylor/Ryder/Latham/McCullum talent bracket (not that they had equal results either).Yeah, I agree. If he makes it to the end of his Test career averaging under 30 without a hundred - which isn't inconceivable - it'll be the biggest waste of a talent for a long, long time.