McCullum the common factor in mindset changes across 2015 and 2022, how about that?From an England POV, I know this is still early days but the transformation over the past two tests in many ways reminds me of our 2015 ODI side which knocked itself out of the world cup unable to chase down 275 against Bangladesh but then 3 months later chased down 350 odd against NZ with 6 overs to spare. I've been very critical of the Root/Silverwood think tank over the past few years but it's still staggering to see how much of a difference a change in mindset, self belief and trust in others can have on the game in terms of results. Even if we remain a middling test side, it's hard not to respect the courage of this team to play with this kind of freedom on a regular basis and a huge positive to generate buzz for test cricket in England regardless of how the results pan out.
I'm keen to know how much he has learnt because he definitely was a meme for a lot of that time. Overly erratic field changes vs Australia at Brisbane in that '15 series, and then abandoning what made the WC campaign a success in the final.McCullum the common factor in mindset changes across 2015 and 2022, how about that?
While in this case the credit does belong (largely) to the England players for playing the way they did, BMac always had vision and ambition , I’ll give him that. Helped him take up roles he didn’t start his career off with (full-time wicketkeeper, test opener) and achieve reasonable success at, and most notably rise above an indifferent board to take NZ up the rankings.
Curious about the later point you make. What did McCullum abandon in the final?I'm keen to know how much he has learnt because he definitely was a meme for a lot of that time. Overly erratic field changes vs Australia at Brisbane in that '15 series, and then abandoning what made the WC campaign a success in the final.
Agree, though introducing youth to a side that is underperforming with leadership problems isn't a great idea - want to fix the latter first.I didn't want to say it and get labelled I'm a child labour promoter You read between the lines correctly.
For a starter look to make good use of Allen, Sears, Ravindra, Phillips, Nathan Smith, Rippon etc. Not all of them in every format but get them in now in their rightful positions. It could be white ball, red ball or mix of both. Like we did in the 2010s when Southee, Boult, Kane, Latham all started to come in. Maybe mostly use them in white ball and slide them into red ball whenever there is a requirement.
I can't see that happening unless they fire Stead, Larsen to start with and then change captain. Larsen and Stead won't be looking at anyone if they are under 30 it feels. Age has almost become a qualification with this management. Latham and Kane could also be the ones from not letting the management change squads. It's that trust they have in the players that have played with for a long time. It may be coming from the right place but it is not working. Last thing we want to see us go down in very format possible. I think we are approaching white ball cricket with the same mindset with borderline retirement players hoping they will do magic like they did in the past.
Lockie is over 30
I'm not dropping this. First high class genuine quick to get treated so poorly by a historically so lightly resourced side. It's insane how we've wasted him. Fleming would have murdered children for him.
It's an injury risk and a possibility of wrecking him for other formats, but I'm still here for the slim possibility that Ferguson plays test cricket again. He hasn't officially retired from test or FC cricket so the first step is for him to play a few FC matches for Auckland.Yeah, I think it'll be really hard to lure Lockie into tests. He's got 2, maybe 3 years to set himself up for life in T20's. If the Indian franchise owners had woken up to his value 4 years ago things might be different, but as things are, and given how many injury problems he's had over the past 2 years, I think he'll have chucked tests in the too risky basket.
Sure, he didn't get it right fairly often and in many was the living embodiment of Warne's whole "gotta be prepared to lose in order to win" schtick. But he did have a vision, and built a brand around NZ cricket. Here in India, during the Vettori-Taylor eras NZ was an afterthought in cricket conversations. After he took over, there was a distinct change in the way people saw NZ; and judging by gpeople's attitudes towards the likes of Sri Lanka, Pakistan and the West Indies, this is a difficult thing to do.I'm keen to know how much he has learnt because he definitely was a meme for a lot of that time. Overly erratic field changes vs Australia at Brisbane in that '15 series, and then abandoning what made the WC campaign a success in the final.
I'd argue the brand is around himself.built a brand around NZ cricket
Sure, this is may be true and for us it was cringe. But I think a lot of people on this forum underestimate the effect it had.I'd argue the brand is around himself.
It's pretty insane that you can justifiably have a 39 year old quick in an XI that you're trying to "build towards".I'm an outsider to County, but I think England can build towards this pretty soon
Lees
Compton
Pope
Root
Bairstow
Stokes
Foakes
Robinson/Wood
Leach
Broad
Anderson
With Robinson, Wood, Stone, Archer, Potts around there are some good options for Anderson and Broad's potentially soon replacements.
I quite like the look of Lees. Anyone can get two low scores on debut but he's scored at least 20 in every innings since. He has a fifty now and his good start yesterday shouldn't be overlooked. Needs to build on those scores but he has been consistent. I'd have Duckett as the other opener.I'm an outsider to County, but I think England can build towards this pretty soon
Lees
Compton
Pope
Root
Bairstow
Stokes
Foakes
Robinson/Wood
Leach
Broad
Anderson
With Robinson, Wood, Stone, Archer, Potts around there are some good options for Anderson and Broad's potentially soon replacements.
Pulled a slip out of the cordon, not long after one of the Aussies - might have been Clarke - snicked it to right where the slip had been.Curious about the later point you make. What did McCullum abandon in the final?
Well yeah, coz otherwise you can never post here.always happy to front up regardless of results and predictions going to ****e. We all know I’m a **** but I’m not a **** with a glass jaw
Agree. Felt the same in that 2nd test Vs SA when we lost Siraj and why I am still up for injury substitutions in cricket. Its just not the same when its basically 10 Vs 11. NZ were very definitely hampered.Nah it absolutely makes a difference in terms of flat out removing an option for the captain. Whether he’d have stemmed it or taken a few wickets, who knows. But he couldn’t have gone for any more than most of the blokes who were bowling.