honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Not to mention never picking any NZ qualified player with the first name Steve.I would definitely end up being distracted and dropping a sitter while posting in the politics forum.
Not to mention never picking any NZ qualified player with the first name Steve.I would definitely end up being distracted and dropping a sitter while posting in the politics forum.
RT Box run out (Cribb/Anderson/+Foakes) 1I would definitely end up being distracted and dropping a sitter while posting in the politics forum.
This isn't even theoretical, is it? There was a pretty similar situation in the series last year in the Lord's game IIRC and Root/Silverwood didn't want anything to do with it at all. Didn't even pretend to try to win the game.Say what you like about Baz as a coach, but there's no way England would've had a bar of that chase a year ago.
IIRC the dropped catch was irrelevant, Pope got out soon after. The short ball tactic was very stupid and the point where England took the game by the scruff of the neck - you have to be good enough to capitalize, for sure and Bairstow was magnificent. But I can imagine Wagner just shaking his head in the balcony. Deviated too early from basic line and length and didn't help that Southee had a poor day, but the mood Bairstow and Stokes were in they'd have found a way you feel.But as others have pointed out, you still cant let a team score 300 in two sessions either. YJB was amazing and Stokes was excellent and Lees played a good knock and that was it. Modern T20 batting and attitudes means the need for bowlers to look for wickets is more important than ever. Maybe that is were NZ faltered, perhaps? There was a dropped catch, wasn't there?
In fairness we didn’t have Stokes and Bairstow in the side last year. I’m not saying it would have made us chase…but it is a factorThis isn't even theoretical, is it? There was a pretty similar situation in the series last year in the Lord's game IIRC and Root/Silverwood didn't want anything to do with it at all. Didn't even pretend to try to win the game.
Different teams (despite the same nations involved), different pitches, slightly different circumstances etc etc but the shift in mindset could not be more obvious.
As others have said, credit to the Kiwi captain and coach.It's good to see England play as more than the sum of their parts. Plucky underdogs who punch above their weight
He played it down himself in the post-match interviews, saying it wasn't anything to put him in doubt for the next Test. (I guess he would say that though, so we'll see. Hope he's right.)Any news on Stokes knee?
I think pope was dropped but he didn't really do much with the chance.Agree. Felt the same in that 2nd test Vs SA when we lost Siraj and why I am still up for injury substitutions in cricket. Its just not the same when its basically 10 Vs 11. NZ were very definitely hampered.
But as others have pointed out, you still cant let a team score 300 in two sessions either. YJB was amazing and Stokes was excellent and Lees played a good knock and that was it. Modern T20 batting and attitudes means the need for bowlers to look for wickets is more important than ever. Maybe that is were NZ faltered, perhaps? There was a dropped catch, wasn't there?