***Offical*** English Football Season 2004/05

[Pratters]

Mourhino sucks because he commented on a ref. What are you talking about. After every premiership match one of the managers has something to say about the ref. So does every suck??

Not every referee commented on after a game recieves death threats and has to go towards the option of retiring.

 

[Tom Halsey]

Mourhino sucks because he commented on a ref. What are you talking about. After every premiership match one of the managers has something to say about the ref. So does every suck??

But you are forgetting that Pratyush suffers from a severe case of sour grapes and everything Chelsea is now bad.

 

[Tom Halsey]

Not every referee commented on after a game recieves death threats and has to go towards the option of retiring.

Unless you are suggesting that Mourinho sent the death threats, Mourinho did nothing more than any other manager.

 

[Link]

But you are forgetting that Pratyush suffers from a severe case of sour grapes and everything Chelsea is now bad.

oh ok, didnt know that

 

[Pratters]

1) While tapping up is against the rules, almost every club in Football is guilty of it... not worse than anyone else there.

Show me some who have been caught like Mournho recently from the English Premiere League.

2) What the hell are you on about?

your Barca angels comment if you remember what you type.

3) Find someone who has done what Mourinho has done? What, criticised a ref, said he saw the Ref with another manager (which is not a new one either) and supposedly tapped someone up? That should be easy.

He called for replacing the referee of the match and caused damage to the referee of the match in the extent he recieved death threats and had to retire.

 

[Pratters]

But you are forgetting that Pratyush suffers from a severe case of sour grapes and everything Chelsea is now bad.

That is a chlidish assumption. Trying to make a personal assumption at that

I would say the same about mourinho even if the barca game hadnt happened. The recent incidents are a disgrace.

 

[Tom Halsey]

1) Show me some who have been caught like Mournho recently from the English Premiere League.



2) your Barca angels comment if you remember what you type.



3) He called for replacing the referee of the match and caused damage to the referee of the match in the extent he recieved death threats and had to retire.

1) Liverpool for one. Everyone does it, merely they were the ones that were caught.

2) Oh I know what I typed, merely you didn't make sense.

3) Not Mourinho who sent the death threats, and without those he wouldn't have retired. Most referees are commented upon, merely Frisk recieved death threats.

 

[Link]

nah you woudnt. Its ok to be bitter, but not to take it out on the winner

 

[Tom Halsey]

That is a chlidish assumption. Trying to make a personal assumption at that

I would say the same about mourinho even if the barca game hadnt happened. The recent incidents are a disgrace.

Which aren't even that bad.

You uttered not a word against Chelsea before they beat you.

 

[Pratters]

1) Liverpool for one. Everyone does it, merely they were the ones that were caught.

Oh there is a special agency involved in catching Mournho then and every one else is too smart and Mourinho is a fool!?

2) Oh I know what I typed, merely you didn't make sense.

As I said, learn to read.

3) Not Mourinho who sent the death threats, and without those he wouldn't have retired. Most referees are commented upon, merely Frisk recieved death threats.

It was the Mournho comments which lead to them if even that much isnt clear to you .
Why would Mourinho ever give any death threat on a referee!?

And when you say most referees are commented upon and merely Frisk recieved the threats, it emphasises further the nature of the sparking off cause of the comments.

 

[Pratters]

Which aren't even that bad.

You uttered not a word against Chelsea before they beat you.

I am saying things about Mournho not chelsea. learn to read again

Its not related to chelsea right now. Just Mourinho and his acts. Jumping to assumptions isnt exactly wise

 

[Link]

ok, do you really believe that Mourinho comments were made by him in order to eventually produce death threats. if not than its not his fault. Its just because he is going to get the blame for it

 

[Pratters]

ok, do you really believe that Mourinho comments were made by him in order to eventually produce death threats. if not than its not his fault. Its just because he is going to get the blame for it

No Mourinho obviously didnt want the death threats to come.

But being an experienced manager that he is, he should have acted more wisely and not made comments that could result in such a scenario.

 

[Pratters]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/c/chelsea/4315301.stm

Regarding the Barca tie :

Those concern Chelsea's claim that Barca's Frank Rijkaard had a meeting with referee Anders Frisk at half-time.

Chelsea, the Blues coach Mourinho, his assistant manager Steve Clarke and security official Les Miles have all been charged after Uefa rejected their claims that Rijkaard entered Frisk's room during that stormy first leg.

It sucked on Mourinho's part to make such a claim which UEFA is denying.

In a statement European football's governing body said the club, Mourinho, Clarke and Miles had made "false declarations" in an attempt "to deliberately create a poisoned and negative ambience".

False declarations = lying

If lying in such a scenario doesnt suck, maybe the defination of sucking is different for you.

 

[Link]

but who can be wise enough to predict the future. I understand what you are saying though and i cant really defend the situation but i can defend mourinho and thats exactly wat your depicting

 

[Pratters]

but who can be wise enough to predict the future. I understand what you are saying though and i cant really defend the situation but i can defend mourinho and thats exactly wat your depicting

No I am not depicting that he intentionally wanted death threats. But I thuoght he could have been wiser.

But the lying part of the above post during the Barca game is pretty shocking.

 

[Link]

as a matter of fact 'suck' does mean somthing else to me. If Mourinho can say one simple statement that has the ability to distarct the opposition which gives you the upper hand and eventually gives you the win, then wow he sucks i'll take that and the win thank you.
But if you think that this is cheating or even a tactic, then that decision 'sucks', just banter my friend

 

[superkingdave]

See this is what i love about Mourinho, real football fans can see him for what he is and enjoy him, but the mandarins in UEFA and the pts's just dont understand him

 

[Link]

i agree

 

[Pratters]

as a matter of fact 'suck' does mean somthing else to me. If Mourinho can say one simple statement that has the ability to distarct the opposition which gives you the upper hand and eventually gives you the win, then wow he sucks i'll take that and the win thank you.
But if you think that this is cheating or even a tactic, then that decision 'sucks', just banter my friend

A comment is great if it can shuffle the opposition. But if it is a lie which UEFA is claiming, it is just that and does suck.