They prove more than "palemro Better Birmingahm"sledger said:damn you and yoru economics, lets keep it simple shall we ? those graphs prove nothing !
you might not even be able to believe how long that actually made me laugh forsuperkingdave said:Nice graph Neil, i came up with a similar one but i included Scotland as well
![]()
yes similarly to the way that anthony mcgraths averages prove that he is the best test allrounder in the worldNeil Pickup said:They prove more than "palemro Better Birmingahm"
Exactly, no provable difference between the leagues!sledger said:yes similarly to the way that anthony mcgraths averages prove that he is the best test allrounder in the world![]()
Points per game distribution of clubs.kendall said:What were those graphs showing exactly?
I would rather not compare the premiership to other leagues but it is undenaible that the top 3 are so far ahead and really no one apart from maybe liverpool will be able to get close to them in the forseeable future. This is bad for the game and will probably result in a european super league we will have to wait to see if that is a good thing or not
yes but based on the evidence given in the stats there is no provable difference between anthony mgcrath and flintoff....but its common knowledge that one is far superior.Neil Pickup said:Exactly, no provable difference between the leagues!
Except in the runs, wickets and high score columns, on the LG/ICC rankingssledger said:yes but based on the evidence given in the stats there is no provable difference between anthony mgcrath and flintoff....but its common knowledge that one is far superior.
Not to mention that the sample space for Anthony McGrath is far too small to draw any statistically significant conclusions from.Neil Pickup said:Except in the runs, wickets and high score columns, on the LG/ICC rankings![]()
and pickups graphs are ?Samuel_Vimes said:Not to mention that the sample space for Anthony McGrath is far too small to draw any statistically significant conclusions from.
As they take into account 400-odd games in each league while Anthony McGrath played 2 (IIRC) tests, I'd say the sample space for his graphs is slightly larger.sledger said:and pickups graphs are ?
I think the idiocy that is mass prize and TV money in the Champions' League has created an unhealable (there is a better word, but I can't get it at the mo) split between the haves and the have-nots of every league, not just the English. The only possible exception is the French, but I'm fairly confident that Marseille, Monaco and Lyon will break away from the pack in a couple of years (think they already have, in fact).sledger said:ok then, so in your honest opinion do you take my side to the argument or do you agree with neil ?
So me.Samuel_Vimes said:I think the idiocy that is mass prize and TV money in the Champions' League has created an unhealable (there is a better word, but I can't get it at the mo) split between the haves and the have-nots of every league, not just the English. The only possible exception is the French, but I'm fairly confident that Marseille, Monaco and Lyon will break away from the pack in a couple of years (think they already have, in fact).
So basically, whether it be Sevilla, Palermo, PSG, NAC Breda, Hertha Berlin, Esbjerg, Sundsvall, Bodø/Glimt, Panahaiki, Ankaragucu, Braga...they're never gonna catch up on a consistent basis with the big clubs, and they're fairly even in skill.