*Nikhil Hearing* Details Thread

[age_master]

a question, im assuming that members or the prosecution (the ones that are speaking in the thread) cannot be called as witnesses?

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

Oh no, ALL will be speaking.

Well then your team will be sacked as prosecution. You've got to follow the trial rules Marc.

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

a question, im assuming that members or the prosecution (the ones that are speaking in the thread) cannot be called as witnesses?

Well witnesses generally speak the truth with a desire to either see the person on trial cleared or imprisoned, so it would have to be situational I guess.

 

[marc71178]

Well then your team will be sacked as prosecution. You've got to follow the trial rules Marc.

Trial?

A trial decides guilty or otherwise.

You yourself have already declared him guilty.

It is also supposedly fair, yet you're restricting the prosecution, so how is that fair.

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

Trial?

A trial decides guilty or otherwise.

You yourself have already declared him guilty.

It is also supposedly fair, yet you're restricting the prosecution, so how is that fair.

Because we're giving the defence the same restrictions.

 

[marc71178]

Hardly a restriction when you seeing how people aren't jumping to help him.

Are you saying that if there were 12 allowed, he'd find 12 people?

 

[lord_of_darkness]

^ nope the max would still stand at 3..

Keep yours to 3 aswell and you can keep the other 12 or whatever to supply evidence or be used as witnesses.. its your call on that ofcourse..
But please try and follow the rule..

 

[Mister Wright]

The ICC document - entitled 'Principles of Natural Justice' which details all workings of any hearing does not put a limit on the number of prosecuters. There is no reason why the numbers of prosecuters or defenders should be capped.

 

[age_master]

1) keep it in control

2) everyone knows what they are doing

3) 3 os more than enough already anyway

4) they will all be doing what marc says anyway

 

[age_master]

why would you possibly need more than 3 anyway?

 

[Adamc]

Hehe Luckyeddie on the defence team, this will be interesting...

 

[Neil Pickup]

1) keep it in control

2) everyone knows what they are doing

3) 3 os more than enough already anyway

4) they will all be doing what marc says anyway

5) Forget the rules? Shall we ignore the other ones like, ooh, 11 players a side? 3 stumps?

 

[Mister Wright]

1) keep it in control

2) everyone knows what they are doing

3) 3 os more than enough already anyway

4) they will all be doing what marc says anyway

No, we are already working as a team. While Marc is leader, he is far from telling us what to do. There is no rule that I can find where the ICC says that there is a minimum amount of prosecutors or defenders, and until found we should be allowed to have as many as we like.

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

It will be chaos if an unlimited amount are allowed.

 

[Jamee999]

Actually Neil 6 stumps should be used in a game of cricket

 

[age_master]

5) Forget the rules? Shall we ignore the other ones like, ooh, 11 players a side? 3 stumps?

that is what you are trying to do isn't it...

 

[Neil Pickup]

That's the comeback of a nine year old, at best.

You want to tell me why you want to ignore the rules?

 

[marc71178]

4) they will all be doing what marc says anyway

Oh really?

Funny that, because all of our team would say that they're speaking for themselves if asked.

 

[marc71178]

It will be chaos if an unlimited amount are allowed.

Why would it?

Besides that, I still don't see why we're having a trial when he's already been declared guilty?

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

Why would it?

Besides that, I still don't see why we're having a trial when he's already been declared guilty?

Read carefully Marc...

We are determining whether he deserves a life ban.