• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Nikhil Hearing* Details Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
thewizard1o1

thewizard1o1

International Debutant
They have a hell of alot of paperwork:D.

If three is the max they can have just call the others as witnessess...they still get to put their veiws and evidence across.
 
age_master

age_master

Hall of Fame Member
Marc can call whomever he wants as a witness, but any evidence (it terms of people wanting to be prosecutors becoming witnesses) they give would likley be inadmissable.
 
lord_of_darkness

lord_of_darkness

Cricket Web XI Moderator
Our prosection team currently numbers 12 (including myself) and all 12 of us have an input to the prosecution, so all 12 of us will be posting.
Click to expand...
call that the research team .. but choose your best 3..
 
marc71178

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
We will use as many as we want anyway!

If it's going to be a fair trial then there cannot be restrictions.
 
Mr Mxyzptlk

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
marc71178 said:
We will use as many as we want anyway!

If it's going to be a fair trial then there cannot be restrictions.
Click to expand...
If you insist on having your multitude post in the trial thread, then it will just have to be called a mistrial and started over and over until you can do it right. In any court case, there is a limit on the number of prosecutors/defence attorneys who can speak in the trial.

Only 3 will be allowed. Name them, or only you will be allowed.
 
superkingdave

superkingdave

Hall of Fame Member
I agree that only a portion of the defence or prosecution teams should be able to speak in court - IRL they dont have a free for all do they? The teams should be allowed to be as large as they want but limited in who can speak in court, as appears to be the case - i dont see how people can have a problem with that, the rest of the team can just communicate through the nominated persons.
 
marc71178

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
age_master said:
Marc can call whomever he wants as a witness, but any evidence (it terms of people wanting to be prosecutors becoming witnesses) they give would likley be inadmissable.
Click to expand...
Why would it be inadmissable?

For a start, we've already been told by Liam that he's guilty.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top