*Nikhil Hearing* Details Thread

[NikhilN]

i dont think that the numbre of questions should be limited, i dont think it will get rediculasly long but 10 questions may not be enough



how about the defence examines and the prosecution cross examines




better give him the date well ahead of time and make sure he is avaliable than...

Yes, please do announce a date for that part

 

[lord_of_darkness]

^ almost cleared with age on msn..

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

i dont think that the numbre of questions should be limited, i dont think it will get rediculasly long but 10 questions may not be enough

Why would 10 questions possibly be too few?

how about the defence examines and the prosecution cross examines

The prosecution is bringing the case on this occasion though.

 

[age_master]

10 questions may well be enough, but im saying we should not be limited to that. we have to wait and see what happens.

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

How about "Defence or prosecution may appeal for further questions if necessary. These will be granted at the discretion of the moderating party (CWBCC) pending their need." ?

 

[age_master]

fine for me there, chances are this would only be used in examining / cross examining the defendant anyway

 

[age_master]

The prosecution is bringing the case on this occasion though.

the defendant is a defence witness

 

[marc71178]

Unless called by the Prosecution.

The prosecution also strongly objects to the restriction in number of witnesses and will disregard it if we see fit.

 

[age_master]

well you can call him if you want make it even easier for us

i have no objection to marc calling as many witnesses as he wants, as long as they all have something relevant to say

 

[marc71178]

How does it make it easier for you?

If we get first pick on him then you're already in trouble, because as soon as he's asked to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothng but the truth we've got him!

 

[age_master]

call him and you will see

 

[steds]

I am not sure but can someone please tell me...has it been 48 overs yet?

overs??

 

[Slats4ever]

this whole thing is becoming a farce imho

 

[marc71178]

We agree, but we have to have it because then when he's justly banned for life, it's been a fair hearing.

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

Unless called by the Prosecution.

The prosecution also strongly objects to the restriction in number of witnesses and will disregard it if we see fit.

Thus resulting in the whole process starting all over again.

 

[NikhilN]

overs??

I dont know why I said that

 

[superkingdave]

I dont know why I said that

Seems to happen a lot

 

[steds]

Only authorized personnel are allowed to speak in the courtroom. Civilians may spectate, but any found voicing himself/herself in any way way will face disciplinary action by the CWBCC according to Rule 5b of the CW Cricket Code of Conduct.

what exatcly is that?


EDIT *realises that I'll have to be authorised to speak to defend Nikhil*
Oh, doesn't matter
*crawls back under rock*

 

[Nate]

overs??

haha, cant believe no-one realised...

 

[Neil Pickup]

It's just so commonplace now, no-one can be bothered to comment.