• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

New Cricket Trivia - 'SJS format'

Mr Mxyzptlk

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Was Zak the 12th man and did the scoring or operated the scoreboard?

Did Zak give them bad food on a thousand occasions?
 
Jamee999

Jamee999

Hall of Fame Member
Mr Mxyzptlk said:
Was Zak the 12th man and did the scoring or operated the scoreboard?
Click to expand...
NO

Q1(Steds) There were two different "Zak's" with the same name? NO
Q2(The Baconator) Is "Zak" extras in another language? NOT APPLICABLE
Q3(Jason)To get 1000 runs. would Zak have been given it ? NO Zak was not given any runs
Q4(Steulen)He was an opposition team bowler who didn't do too well in matches against them that year?NO
Q5(SJS)He was an opposing bowler who bowled a thousand wides and no balls against them ? NO
Q6(SJS)Is Zak a player ? YES
Q7(Mr Mxyzptlk)Was Zak the 12th man and did the scoring or operated the scoreboard? NO
 
Jamee999

Jamee999

Hall of Fame Member
Pratyush said:
q) was Zaq Zaheer Khan or Zaheer Abbas?
Click to expand...
NO

Q1(Steds) There were two different "Zak's" with the same name? NO
Q2(The Baconator) Is "Zak" extras in another language? NOT APPLICABLE
Q3(Jason)To get 1000 runs. would Zak have been given it ? NO Zak was not given any runs
Q4(Steulen)He was an opposition team bowler who didn't do too well in matches against them that year?NO
Q5(SJS)He was an opposing bowler who bowled a thousand wides and no balls against them ? NO
Q6(SJS)Is Zak a player ? YES
Q7(Mr Mxyzptlk)Was Zak the 12th man and did the scoring or operated the scoreboard? NO
Q8(Pratyush)was Zaq Zaheer Khan or Zaheer Abbas? NO
 
J

JASON

Cricketer Of The Year
membersstand said:
You haven't answered my guess...
Click to expand...
Membersstand has a point !! Jamee has avoided answering his question ,which looks dodgy to me !!

And IIRC this is not the first time Jamee999 has done this, as after posting a similar question sometime ago he did the same ! :laughing: (a similar abstract question [something about how many minutes were played in a match], where Bryce answered it , But Jamee continued to pretend and ignore the answer for a further 1 or 2 days entertaining other answers !! :D :D ). Bryce can concur with me on this !!

In my opinion Membersstand has probably hit the clue to the question and our friend Jamee is trying to pretend he didn't see that answer !! :laughing: :laughing:
 
Last edited:
SJS

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
JASON said:
Membersstand has a point !! Jamee has avoided answering his question ,which looks dodgy to me !!

And IIRC this is not the first time Jamee999 has done this, as after posting a similar question sometime ago he did the same ! :laughing: (a similar abstract question [something about how many minutes were played in a match], where Bryce answered it , But Jamee continued to pretend and ignore the answer for a further 1 or 2 days entertaining other answers !! :D :D ). Bryce can concur with me on this !!

In my opinion Membersstand has probably hit the clue to the question and our friend Jamee is trying to pretend he didn't see that answer !! :laughing: :laughing:
Click to expand...
Yes I recall that one.

Shall we modify the rules a bit. If a question is not answered , all questions anwered (giving some allowance for questions being answered one after the other but not in the order asked), after that question, will not be counted towards the twenty questions. This way, the people guessing will actually gain and the person asking will suffer :p

One condition though, the person whose question is not being answered must give at least one reminder if another question is answered while his is ignored/forgotten.

What do you say fellows ?
 
Jamee999

Jamee999

Hall of Fame Member
thememberstand said:
It doesn't say his team 100 runs was with "that team"
Click to expand...
Can you expand on your question please, I don't understand what you are asking

The Baconator said:
Was the team a test team?
Click to expand...
YES

SJS said:
Are the runs cricket runs as widely undestood ? (Not tummy 'runs' or something else)
Click to expand...
YES

JASON said:
Was "Zak" the groundsman/curator ?
Click to expand...
NO

Q1(Steds) There were two different "Zak's" with the same name? NO
Q2(The Baconator) Is "Zak" extras in another language? NOT APPLICABLE
Q3(Jason)To get 1000 runs. would Zak have been given it ? NO Zak was not given any runs
Q4(Steulen)He was an opposition team bowler who didn't do too well in matches against them that year?NO
Q5(SJS)He was an opposing bowler who bowled a thousand wides and no balls against them ? NO
Q6(SJS)Is Zak a player ? YES
Q7(Mr Mxyzptlk)Was Zak the 12th man and did the scoring or operated the scoreboard? NO
Q8(Pratyush)was Zaq Zaheer Khan or Zaheer Abbas? NO
Q9(The Baconator)Was the team a test team?YES
Q10(SJS)Are the runs cricket runs as widely undestood ? (Not tummy 'runs' or something else)YES
Q11(JASON)Was "Zak" the groundsman/curator ?NO
Hint 2: The Inital"incident" was an accident
 
SJS

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
Was Zak someone who got player/players for the team which resulted in their getting 1000 runs ?
 
membersstand

membersstand

State Vice-Captain
Don't worry about my last.

Was Zak named in the 11, got injured before the match (in an accidental incident), and didn't take any part in the match, meaning he was still a team member, and so scored "team runs", without actually "playing for that team" ??
 
Jamee999

Jamee999

Hall of Fame Member
The Argonaut said:
Was the incident a technicality of the rules that wasn't understood by an umpire (former player)?
Click to expand...
NO

SJS said:
Was Zak someone who got player/players for the team which resulted in their getting 1000 runs ?
Click to expand...
YES

thememberstand said:
Was Zak named in the 11, got injured before the match (in an accidental incident), and didn't take any part in the match, meaning he was still a team member, and so scored "team runs", without actually "playing for that team" ??
Click to expand...
NO

Q1(Steds) There were two different "Zak's" with the same name? NO
Q2(The Baconator) Is "Zak" extras in another language? NOT APPLICABLE
Q3(Jason)To get 1000 runs. would Zak have been given it ? NO Zak was not given any runs
Q4(Steulen)He was an opposition team bowler who didn't do too well in matches against them that year?NO
Q5(SJS)He was an opposing bowler who bowled a thousand wides and no balls against them ? NO
Q6(SJS)Is Zak a player ? YES
Q7(Mr Mxyzptlk)Was Zak the 12th man and did the scoring or operated the scoreboard? NO
Q8(Pratyush)was Zaq Zaheer Khan or Zaheer Abbas? NO
Q9(The Baconator)Was the team a test team?YES
Q10(SJS)Are the runs cricket runs as widely undestood ? (Not tummy 'runs' or something else)YES
Q11(JASON)Was "Zak" the groundsman/curator ?NO
Hint 2: The Inital"incident" was an accident
Q12(The Argonaut)Was the incident a technicality of the rules that wasn't understood by an umpire (former player)? NO
Q13(SJS)Was Zak someone who got player/players for the team which resulted in their getting 1000 runs? YES
Q14(thememberstand)Was Zak named in the 11, got injured before the match (in an accidental incident), and didn't take any part in the match, meaning he was still a team member, and so scored "team runs", without actually "playing for that team??NO
 
A

apartheid smash

Banned
Jamee999 said:
NO


YES


NO

Q1(Steds) There were two different "Zak's" with the same name? NO
Q2(The Baconator) Is "Zak" extras in another language? NOT APPLICABLE
Q3(Jason)To get 1000 runs. would Zak have been given it ? NO Zak was not given any runs
Q4(Steulen)He was an opposition team bowler who didn't do too well in matches against them that year?NO
Q5(SJS)He was an opposing bowler who bowled a thousand wides and no balls against them ? NO
Q6(SJS)Is Zak a player ? YES
Q7(Mr Mxyzptlk)Was Zak the 12th man and did the scoring or operated the scoreboard? NO
Q8(Pratyush)was Zaq Zaheer Khan or Zaheer Abbas? NO
Q9(The Baconator)Was the team a test team?YES
Q10(SJS)Are the runs cricket runs as widely undestood ? (Not tummy 'runs' or something else)YES
Q11(JASON)Was "Zak" the groundsman/curator ?NO
Hint 2: The Inital"incident" was an accident
Q12(The Argonaut)Was the incident a technicality of the rules that wasn't understood by an umpire (former player)? NO
Q13(SJS)Was Zak someone who got player/players for the team which resulted in their getting 1000 runs? YES
Q14(thememberstand)Was Zak named in the 11, got injured before the match (in an accidental incident), and didn't take any part in the match, meaning he was still a team member, and so scored "team runs", without actually "playing for that team??NO
Click to expand...
tell it to the little red hen , mr fernandez
 
S

Steulen

International Regular
OK, this must refer to that innings by some Australian state team when they got 1000, and Zak is probably the coach or somesuch. You guys can fill in the names.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top