SJS
Hall of Fame Member
Bryce you go ahead.JASON said:Since SJS gave the answer of Martin Snedden , I guess its SJS's turn . or Bryce you can take up the next question.
Bryce you go ahead.JASON said:Since SJS gave the answer of Martin Snedden , I guess its SJS's turn . or Bryce you can take up the next question.
Can't see why not !!Jamee999 said:Can we do mine after?
NOsteds said:There were two different "Zak's" with the same name?
Q) How did "Zak" get a team 1000 runs in a year with out playing for that team?The Baconator said:Is "Zak" extras in another language?
don't ask too many questionsTapioca said:Alfred Shaw & Arthur Shrewsbury.
NO Zak was not given any runsJASON said:This is obviously a trick question and at this time of the night my brain is not keen to think too much.
To get 1000 runs. would Zak have been given it ?![]()
![]()
(that sounds very silly !!) (I can't figure this one !)
NOSteulen said:He was an opposition team bowler who didn't do too well in matches against them that year?
NOSJS said:He was an opposing bowler who bowled a thousand wides and no balls against them ?
Is Zak a player ?Jamee999 said:NO Zak was not given any runs
NO
NO
Q1(Steds) There were two different "Zak's" with the same name? NO
Q2(The Baconator) Is "Zak" extras in another language? NOT APPLICABLE
Q3(Jason)To get 1000 runs. would Zak have been given it ? NO Zak was not given any runs
Q4(Steulen)He was an opposition team bowler who didn't do too well in matches against them that year?NO
Q5(SJS)He was an opposing bowler who bowled a thousand wides and no balls against them ? NO
As you lot aren't doing too well:
Hint 1
He didn't play against the team either.
It is an abstract question...think carefully.
YESSJS said:Is Zak a player ?