-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
New Cricket Trivia - 'SJS format'
- Thread starter JASON
- Start date
SJS
Hall of Fame Member
84
Whats so unique about this number ?
Q1 is it to do with a batsmans score?....NO
Q2. Is it to do with batting?....NO
Q3. Scotland won the Intercontinental Cup by an innings and 84 runs......NO
Q4. is it to do with bowling???.....NO
Q5. is it to do with fielding???.....NO
Q6. is it a crowd figure??......NO
Q7. is it an age??.....NO
Q8. is it to do with matches/ series?....YES
HINT #1 : It is a number of test matches ! But it has to do with no player past or present.
Q9. any thing to do with umpires???....NO
Q10. number of tests played between 2 countries?.....NO
Q11. tests at a certain ground?.....NO
HINT # 2 : The significance of this number could be gone by May this year !!
Thats a big big hint
Whats so unique about this number ?
Q1 is it to do with a batsmans score?....NO
Q2. Is it to do with batting?....NO
Q3. Scotland won the Intercontinental Cup by an innings and 84 runs......NO
Q4. is it to do with bowling???.....NO
Q5. is it to do with fielding???.....NO
Q6. is it a crowd figure??......NO
Q7. is it an age??.....NO
Q8. is it to do with matches/ series?....YES
HINT #1 : It is a number of test matches ! But it has to do with no player past or present.
Q9. any thing to do with umpires???....NO
Q10. number of tests played between 2 countries?.....NO
Q11. tests at a certain ground?.....NO
HINT # 2 : The significance of this number could be gone by May this year !!
Thats a big big hint
SJS
Hall of Fame Member
Q14. Is it related to Bangladesh?.....NO
Q15. Is it related to England?.....NO
Q16. Is it related to Pakistan?.....NO
Q17. Is it related to West Indies?.....NO
Q18. Is it related to South Africa?.....NO
I dont think you are going to get it. So here is the final and the best hint.
HINT 3 4 : The last number which was posed as a similar question was 229 ! And it was a similar question with a similar answer !
Come on ! You must get it now !!!
Q15. Is it related to England?.....NO
Q16. Is it related to Pakistan?.....NO
Q17. Is it related to West Indies?.....NO
Q18. Is it related to South Africa?.....NO
I dont think you are going to get it. So here is the final and the best hint.
HINT 3 4 : The last number which was posed as a similar question was 229 ! And it was a similar question with a similar answer !
Come on ! You must get it now !!!
Sorry SJS,
You've got me stumped. The four answers to the 229 question were: lowest number not scored by a batsman in a completed Test innings; score made by SA vs SL when eliminated from the WC2003; score made by Ban vs. Ind in their first ODI win as a Test playing nation; and the highest ever individual ODI batting score.
None of those four I can relate to 84 Test matches. Two are individual records, the other two are team totals...I can't see how this is in any way 'very similar' to 84, which has been confirmed as a number of Test matches not referring ot any individual player or umpire.
You've got me stumped. The four answers to the 229 question were: lowest number not scored by a batsman in a completed Test innings; score made by SA vs SL when eliminated from the WC2003; score made by Ban vs. Ind in their first ODI win as a Test playing nation; and the highest ever individual ODI batting score.
None of those four I can relate to 84 Test matches. Two are individual records, the other two are team totals...I can't see how this is in any way 'very similar' to 84, which has been confirmed as a number of Test matches not referring ot any individual player or umpire.
membersstand
State Vice-Captain
How dare you call my question silly!!!
I must cease work on Economics and answer Guru SJS' question immediately !!!
I must cease work on Economics and answer Guru SJS' question immediately !!!
membersstand
State Vice-Captain
Can we turn back those last 5 questions ? THey were a bit of a waste...
Can the record be broken by any one of those teams ?
Can the record be broken by any one of those teams ?
SJS
Hall of Fame Member
There is one of them which is similar. I wish I could tell you more but then I might as well provide the answerSteulen said:Sorry SJS,
You've got me stumped. The four answers to the 229 question were: lowest number not scored by a batsman in a completed Test innings; score made by SA vs SL when eliminated from the WC2003; score made by Ban vs. Ind in their first ODI win as a Test playing nation; and the highest ever individual ODI batting score.
None of those four I can relate to 84 Test matches. Two are individual records, the other two are team totals...I can't see how this is in any way 'very similar' to 84, which has been confirmed as a number of Test matches not referring ot any individual player or umpire.
