If he was regular JOE, it would have been different. BUt being the PM of AUS..does make a difference.chicane said:But being the Prime Minister of Australia he shouldn't make public statements like that.
Last edited:
If he was regular JOE, it would have been different. BUt being the PM of AUS..does make a difference.chicane said:But being the Prime Minister of Australia he shouldn't make public statements like that.
JBH001 said:Sudeep Popat that was a great read on those links.
Thanks for that.
I am now, more than ever, behind Murali on this one.
The only reason I can think of why he should stop bowling the doosra is that he is a better and more effective bowler without it.
Though if he was banned for 12 months it might be a good thing.
A year off the game, time to rest and recover from a history of injuries in the last few years and perhaps fine tune his action - which has become a bit ragged in the last year or so.
He may be back - better than ever!
At least the guy had the integrity to come to Australia twice before knowing full well the Umpsanzac said:oh and now he's contemplating pulling out of the AUS tour because the PM called him a chucker...............what does he expect - his delivery action has been found to be illegal and he has continued to use it - he's just lucky that they didn't ask Howard if he thought he was a cheat!!!!!!!
![]()
And thats where this whole issue turned into a circus, by not accepting the umpires decision and changing his actions to comply with the rules he decided to turn it into a racial issue and put cricket back 20 years. That doesnt take guts, reserve that title for the players who deserve it, what Murali did was selfish.JASON said:At least the guy had the integrity to come to Australia twice before knowing full well the Umps were going to call him and the crowds were going to give him a hard time. Says a lot about character, than some others who pull up with injuries when they fear they have to go to certain parts of the world where they may get called.
I have never heard Murali or the Lankan cricket chaps call this a racial issue!!Scallywag said:And thats where this whole issue turned into a circus, by not accepting the umpires decision and changing his actions to comply with the rules he decided to turn it into a racial issue and put cricket back 20 years. That doesnt take guts, reserve that title for the players who deserve it, what Murali did was selfish.
What a load of bull.Scallywag said:And thats where this whole issue turned into a circus, by not accepting the umpires decision and changing his actions to comply with the rules he decided to turn it into a racial issue and put cricket back 20 years. That doesnt take guts, reserve that title for the players who deserve it, what Murali did was selfish.
As per usual.a massive zebra said:What a load of bull.![]()
Scallywag said:And thats where this whole issue turned into a circus, by not accepting the umpires decision and changing his actions to comply with the rules he decided to turn it into a racial issue and put cricket back 20 years. That doesnt take guts, reserve that title for the players who deserve it, what Murali did was selfish.
koch_cha said:
Well, the stupidity of international statesmen knows no bounds, so when you compare them to the ICC, they're perhaps in good company.anzac said:should the ICC ban SRL now because their PM has threatened to sue????
fair enough................but that was then & this is now..........during the prior incidents I was prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt.............but not any longer - there is NO doubt re the legality of his delivery action re the Doosra, nor any confusion as to what his obligations are or those of the SLCB etc........JASON said:At least the guy had the integrity to come to Australia twice before knowing full well the Umpswere going to call him and the crowds were going to give him a hard time. Says a lot about character, than some others
![]()
who pull up with injuries when they fear
they have to go to certain parts of the world where they may get called. He is also rightly concerned of the aussie media bandwagon
and the likes of Barry Jarman
who may turn up at the ground with his protractors
to measure the angles.
![]()
if you are referring to the current controversy then I agree with your assertion that Murali should have 'done the right thing' - but I don't get the racial issue unless you are implying it is such by virtue of AUS = white & SRL = black - but I'd still say that it's a fairly loooong stretch to get that one - rather it's more a simple case of 'us 'n them'...........Scallywag said:And thats where this whole issue turned into a circus, by not accepting the umpires decision and changing his actions to comply with the rules he decided to turn it into a racial issue and put cricket back 20 years. That doesnt take guts, reserve that title for the players who deserve it, what Murali did was selfish.
On the contrary, he knows how to get re-elected. He knows his politics.Neil Pickup said:
That's the way most politicians think.Neil Pickup said:Interesting observation.