• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Michael Holding vs Waqar Younis

Who was the greater bowler? (Tests)

  • Michael Holding

    Votes: 25 64.1%
  • Waqar Younis

    Votes: 14 35.9%

  • Total voters
    39

Coronis

International Coach
It's from halfway of his career. He was ahead of everyone by a huge margin in the 1870s, but by the 2nd half of the 80s, Shrewsbury was better/equal. Then ofcourse in the 90s Ranji took the crown. Also, ofcourse his competition was shittier, Daft was no Hammond, Jupp no Headley and Beldham was 6 years older to Grace than he was to Sobers. I find Ranji's quote on Grace's batting to be very own point.
You mean by the time Grace was 40?
 

pardus

U19 12th Man
Waqar's rise was so meteoric. He made his Test debut in the same Test match that Sachin Tendulkar made his debut. Within an year, he was considered one of the most lethal bowlers in the world.

I have rarely seen another fast bowler consistently swing the ball that much, and that late, as Waqar did at his peak.
If you had watched him live back in the early 90s, it was impossible not to be astonished.
Again, much like peak Patrick Patterson's pace, YouTube replays don't do much justice.

Many times the ball would leave his bowling hand way outside off stump (around sixth stump line), and even be directed slightly away from the batsman (slightly towards the first-slip), you would naturally assume it was going to be an off-side wide - and what made it extremely difficult for the batsman was that, the ball would begin by following that expected 'off-side wide' trajectory as it travelled across the first half of the pitch, before rapidly swinging in to the leg-side and crashing into the middle or leg stump (or the unfortunate batsman's foot/leg). And all this at tremendous pace.

But Waqar couldn't acheive this kind of swing everywhere. He didn't look as lethal in Australia or in the Carribean, as he looked in the subcontinent, England and New Zealand.

At his peak, it was amazing to watch Waqar's battles with Martin Crowe, Carl Hooper and Brian Lara.

Like Steyn, Waqar could be very expensive for a great Test bowler even at his peak. I remember Aravinda De Silva gving him a proper hiding in a 1994 Test match. Phil Simmons and Lara did the same in a Test match in Barbados in 1993.

Waqar's fall was as precepitious as his rise was meteoric. He seemed to have lost his pace almost overnight. The last time in his career where he looked consistently quick was when Pak toured RSA-Zimbabwe in early 1998. He was never the same bowler after that, although he played for nearly 5 more years. Within an year he was dropped from the playing XI in Eden Gardens Test against India in 1999, to make place for Shoaib Akhtar. He still played a lot for Pakistan but he just had one 5 wicket haul in rest of his career after the RSA-Zimbabwe tour in early 1998 (about 60 innings), and that was against Bangladesh.
 

Top