CodeOfWisden
U19 Cricketer
Dunno why Australia went with Lee, especially away from home(eng). He just leaked runs.Peronally I would rate a gillespie/Lee/McWarne attack higher
Dunno why Australia went with Lee, especially away from home(eng). He just leaked runs.Peronally I would rate a gillespie/Lee/McWarne attack higher
Yes, at least Ishant has been doing well recently.Easily the worst bowler to have taken 300 test wickets.
Even though Warne offers something different with spin?Ambrose has as good a shot at being the second greatest pacer ever as Mcgrath.
Combine that with Bishop and Walsh and I think I"ll take them over McWarne and dizzy by a hair's breadth.
Windies 80s - yesThese attacks are on par or better
I'm ignoring India here but the bold aren't - mostly that they lack the variety (latter day AshJaddu with Bumrah, Ishant, Shami, Yadav has a shout for variety though) - which isn't to say those in bold weren't fantastic, they clearly were. But for most teams (not named India or Lara), McWarne (and the supporting cast) clearly presented a different challenge.These attacks are on par or better
Windies 80s
Ambrose, Walsh, Bishop
Donald, pollock.
Steyn, Morkel,Philander
Wasim, Waqar, Saqlain.
Ashwin, Jadeja in India
Cummins, Haze, Starc, Lyon
I am just saying that scoring big in home conditions against ATG bowlers isn't actually a rare feat.
Hmm real mystery. Probably had nothing to do with him averaging 16 with the ball and 37 with the bat in his career before the 2001 Ashes. Weird how they picked himDunno why Australia went with Lee, especially away from home(eng). He just leaked runs.
I know this is a bit off topic but weren't we discussing individual performances of batsman in a series.Ashwin, Jadeja in India - if you have to qualify with a "in....." then they can't be in the argument
Broad+Jimmy+woakes in English conditions would be up there aswell tbh, all very dangerous is swinging conditions.These attacks are on par or better
Windies 80s
Ambrose, Walsh, Bishop
Donald, pollock.
Steyn, Morkel,Philander
Wasim, Waqar, Saqlain.
Ashwin, Jadeja in India
Cummins, Haze, Starc, Lyon
I am just saying that scoring big in home conditions against ATG bowlers isn't actually a rare feat.
Lara also **** on purple patch Murali during that insane SL away tour, no? Feel that's far more comparable.I know this is a bit off topic but weren't we discussing individual performances of batsman in a series.
For me a great performance against Ashwin and Jadeja in India is as good as a performance against McWarne actually its even more difficult coz I don't recall many batsman doing well against them.
So for example Smiths performance in india in 2016 should again be rated higher than Lara's 1999.
So just imagine how much he averaged after that to close in at 31 career bowling avg and 20 batting avg.Hmm real mystery. Probably had nothing to do with him averaging 16 with the ball and 37 with the bat in his career before the 2001 Ashes. Weird how they picked him
ok?So just imagine how much he averaged after that to close in at 31 career bowling avg and 20 batting avg.
England 2010-11 attack bowled out of their skins. Good point about not just going with names. Johnson 2013-14 series is regarded by many as the best ever bowling in a series but no one's going to put Mitchell Johnson in any ATG teamsBroad+ Anderson+ Tremlett/Bresnan/Swann and Ashwin/Jadeja/Shami-Yadav at various points in home conditions was always incredibly potent. You cant just go by the names and say they werent as good as the ATg attacks. At home, they were as tough a challenge as any imo. Different story abroad when compared to McWarne, of course.