Nah.Just do CricSim ffs
CricSim would be a very ongoing commitment too.Agreed.
Standardised averages more important.
Okay I'll put off my updates until then.Lets wait until root career ends
Exile from politics for a month sounds like a dream come true.I keep telling people I don't have time but I've actually been sent on exile for a month so I might even do actually that!
Stop teasin boiOkay I'll put off my updates until then.
I have also had to resign from my job entirely for at least six months so it's not all that fun on a financial level.Exile from politics for a month sounds like a dream come true.
Stop teasin boi
Really actually sorry to hear that mate. Nothing malicious intended.I have also had to resign from my job entirely for at least six months so it's not all that fun on a financial level.
And on a personal level, not being allowed to see someone when we both want to constantly makes me feel like I'm 14 (and yeah yeah don't worry she's in her in 30s as well, joke defused)
Anyway, not sure how we got here. Yay David!
Active players are generally going to be a bit overrated on here since they haven’t gone through the decline phase.Interesting this is quite close
Either that or the fab 3 are going to be rated higher after they retire.Active players are generally going to be a bit overrated on here since they haven’t gone through the decline phase.
Root had the talent to be as good as Dravid but I think he lacks the same hunger of runs/concentration that most ATGs have (poor conversion rate and averaged 25 in Pakistan). Still a great player though who’s played in a very tough era.
Be fair.Root had the talent to be as good as Dravid but I think he lacks the same hunger of runs/concentration that most ATGs have ( conversion rate problems and averaged 25 in Pakistan). Still a great player though who’s played in a very tough era and not that far behind Dravid.
You misunderstood my post. I never said his record in Pak was a hole.Be fair.
Root played five innings in pakistan, that's nowhere near enough sample size.
plus, Root has 34 100s in 265 innings while Dravid has 36 in 286 innings, thus is Root taking less innings per hundred, him having one more 50 doesn't really mean anything, as making 50s isn't a bad thing ie the last match where his 50 was very important to england winning the game.
made up issue imo, bar a mid career slump because of mentality, he has converted and cashed in pretty well and consistently, there are gonna be mishaps but there is no point acting like Dravid didn't have them either.You misunderstood my post. I never said his record in Pak was a hole.
I’m just saying his poor conversion rate and him not always cashing in is why he’ll probably end up with a worse record/average than Dravid when his career is over,
I guess we’ll see at the end of his career how close his record is to Dravid. Dravid was averaging 58 at Roots age. If Root is still averaging around 50 at the end, then he’s definitely as good as Dravid.made up issue imo, bar a mid career slump because of mentality, he has converted and cashed in pretty well and consistently, there are gonna be mishaps but there is no point acting like Dravid didn't have them either.
fair enough, tho just to be clear at 33 even Lara himself was averaging only 50.1I guess we’ll see at the end of his career how close his record is to Dravid. Dravid was averaging 58 at Roots age. If Root is still averaging around 50 at the end, then he’s definitely as good as Dravid.
Yea some like Lara and Sanga were able to maintain their performances but some like Ponting and Dravid declined badly after 33 which is why it’s hard to rate players still playingfair enough, tho just to be clear at 33 even Lara himself was averaging only 50.1
How about we remove Sri Lanka and West Indies for Root as both have had weak attacks during Root's entire test career.I think Root is possibly better. Now before certain section of fans go after me, let's take a look at their stats excluding Bangladesh and Zimbabwe. Root averages 51 while Dravid averages 49. Both superb players of swing and seam bowling but not so good vs pace and bounce. Root is slightly better than Dravid vs spin. Root is also a naturally more aggressive batsman than Dravid with wider range of strokes.
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
stats.espncricinfo.com