DrWolverine
First Class Debutant
Living Legend
Living Legend
Bumrah may have a better average or strike rate but he is not going to get anywhere close to the number of wicketsWon’t get anywhere near Hadlee’s records tho.
That is also due to having a lot more competition for wicketsBumrah may have a better average or strike rate but he is not going to get anywhere close to the number of wickets
TrueThat is also due to having a lot more competition for wickets
Most wickets: Sir Curtly, second: Hadlee (equal with that bugger Barnes)
Holding probably marginally, Roberts would be a no for me.All time greats
You gotta flaunt it, if you have it!The fact that Bumrah is being compared to MM is a testimony to how good he is but you people need to put your penises back in your pantses for a fair while longer imo
Kumble and Ashwin are ATGs.For 100 years India did not have a single great bowler.
Kumble and Ashwin are ATGs.
There are 4-5 ATG spinners at most, Murali, Warne, Laker, O Reilly and GrimmettKumble and Ashwin are ATGs.
didn't Ashwin lose a poll to UnderwoodAccording to this poll Ashwin is an ATG
Is Ravichandran Ashwin an ATG test bowler?
Now that he has reached 500 wickets is he ATG?www.cricketweb.net
He beat both Laker and Underwooddidn't Ashwin lose a poll to Underwood
I agree with this because the 100 years between 1,000,100 years ago and 1,000,000 years ago was before the advent of Homo sapiens.For 100 years India did not have a single great bowler. And there is a chance they may end up with the bowler having the best bowling average of all time.
lame, Underwood and Laker were both betterHe beat both Laker and Underwood