he doesn’t have 1/100 of the fame precisely because he is a lesser batsman. Was not seen as top tier in his timeKen Barrington may have 1/100th the fame or stature or hype of Viv Richards but he is no less than him as a batsman.
he doesn’t have 1/100 of the fame precisely because he is a lesser batsman. Was not seen as top tier in his timeKen Barrington may have 1/100th the fame or stature or hype of Viv Richards but he is no less than him as a batsman.
He doesn’t have the fame because he was a boring player. Viv was an exciting player. People tend to under/over rate athletes based on how exciting or watchable they are.he doesn’t have 1/100 of the fame precisely because he is a lesser batsman. Was not seen as top tier in his time
Root probably, but he should end better than Ponting as well. Definitely not KP, Cowdrey is better than him.Lame
Joe Root and Kevin Pietersen better than Ken Barrington
Averages aren’t everything
Pietersen barely makes England’s top 10 batsmen.Root probably, but he should end better than Ponting as well. Definitely not KP, Cowdrey is better than him.
He doesn't makes mine, even not counting Grace, Ranji or Shrewsbury :Pietersen barely makes England’s top 10 batsmen.
Eh he’s above Cowdrey and around Cook’s level for me.He doesn't makes mine, even not counting Grace, Ranji or Shrewsbury :
Hobbs
Hutton
Hammond
Sutcliffe
Root
Barrington
Compton
May
Boycott
Cook
Cowdrey
I would take both ahead of him personally, but don't think there's much between those 3 (and Gooch and Gower, probably Dexter too).Eh he’s above Cowdrey and around Cook’s level for me.
HobbsHe doesn't makes mine, even not counting Grace, Ranji or Shrewsbury :
Hobbs
Hutton
Hammond
Sutcliffe
Root
Barrington
Compton
May
Boycott
Cook
Cowdrey
Dude, you literally just made one change to my list......Hobbs
Hutton
Hammond
Sutcliffe
Root (subject to change)
Barrington
Compton
May (might be above Compton)
Boycott
Gooch
Cook
for me, so Nah
Yeah that.Dude, you literally just made one change to my list......
(And if by 'nah' you are referring to KP being a Top 10 English bat and not my list, then I agree and ignore the rest of the comment)
So what is it then?Its never been specifically about averages, and you know that. Don’t be disingenuous.
So average......As @ankitj has pointed out, Kallis and Sanga had similar length careers to him and were able to maintain better performance. Barrington, really I shouldn’t need to say anything. Greatest away record apart from Bradman, ridiculous output, multiple tons against everyone, tons in every country he played in.
Because it's just spread sheets.Hobbs is the only one who is clearly ahead of him. Hammond. Hutton. Sutcliffe. Barrington. Same tier for me.
Don't do that,Agreed, Ken (Barrington) fits in well with Jack/Kumar/Barry and Ricky
Like, that's not true when compared with Ponting for Sangakkara (actually he is the closest to truth here), Kallis (I mean, you seem to agree) and especially BarringtonSo average......
Who cares if they batted on mostly flatbeds and way worse attacks right?
Nuance, context and just probably watching the game helps with all these things.
But as was said, let's not lay it all onto the mindless masses.
Exactly, lol.
Kobe / Duncan was partially because one was literally in LA.He doesn’t have the fame because he was a boring player. Viv was an exciting player. People tend to under/over rate athletes based on how exciting or watchable they are.
See: Kobe/Duncan
And nothing to do with boring or exciting. Forget for a moment the excitement, and helping to expand the game etc.He doesn’t have the fame because he was a boring player. Viv was an exciting player. People tend to under/over rate athletes based on how exciting or watchable they are.
See: Kobe/Duncan
Kevin Pietersen isn’t better than a floppy week old banana.