Barry Bonds has hit the most Home Runs in the history of Major League Baseball.Well who wants to give a valid reason about what I have said or proved is dumb
Who's to say he isntArgh everytime I see this thread I keep thinking JP Duminy is going to give us his opinions and predictions
Could just be that sod all beat the bat.Well he also holds the record for the least amount of byes let through in a series in india. This really convince me what a terrific player he is.
Jack Blackham was considerably better. Why? Because he missed less, and stood up to the stumps in the days when protection offered by wicketkeeping gloves was pretty slim.Yes I can. And until you can name a keeper who is better than Boucher and prove why than I will stick to my guns thanks very much.
None of them are betterJack Blackham was considerably better. Why? Because he missed less, and stood up to the stumps in the days when protection offered by wicketkeeping gloves was pretty slim.
There's no shortage of others who were better than Boucher too. A few examples, counting purely players who played Test cricket in the 20th-century: Bert Oldfield, George Duckworth, Leslie Ames, Keith Andrew, Bob Taylor, Don Tallon, Alan Knott, Syed Kirmani, Deryck Murray. There won't be any shortage of others either.
yes they doYes, they are. Statistics can't tell you all that much about a wicketkeeper, unlike other cricketing skills. Hence, no amount of clueless posturing from someone who thinks the wicketkeeper with the most Test dismissals is the best will make the wicketkeeper with most Test dismissals the best wicketkeeper of all-time.
The preferred term is nonce TBH.You're a clueless pratt, and the sooner you get banned the better.
Not sorry.
I realise that he's very frustrating, but these sort of posts won't be tolerated. I suggest you take your own advice and just learn to ignore him; I get the feeling you won't have to do it for very long so it's not worth the risk.You're a clueless pratt, and the sooner you get banned the better.
Not sorry.