• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Is Flintoff Overrated?

Is Flintoff Overrated?

  • Yes

    Votes: 39 43.3%
  • No

    Votes: 49 54.4%
  • Don't No

    Votes: 2 2.2%

  • Total voters
    90

tooextracool

International Coach
Tom Halsey said:
He didn't get out to Sarwan every time, and he still batted rather well until he did get out on most occasions.
out of 5 innings he was out thrice to part timers....twice due to poor strokes off sarwan and once when he chipped one straight back to dwayne smith.
 

tooextracool

International Coach
Tom Halsey said:
Freddy gets much more bounce, is much more accurate...and is currently taking more wickets in general though.
white in his prime was much better though and his performances against the WI and in pakistan show that.
 

tooextracool

International Coach
Tom Halsey said:
So apart from the 142 or whatever it was, what other performances came in dead rubber situations then?
one of his 50s at headingly came in dead rubber.....regardless we all thought that he had become a more mature player after that series but what happened in his next 6 test matches certainly didnt emphasise that......
 

Tom Halsey

International Coach
tooextracool said:
out of 5 innings he was out thrice to part timers....twice due to poor strokes off sarwan and once when he chipped one straight back to dwayne smith.
Yes, but that doesn't alter the fact that he batted rather well to get there.
 

Tom Halsey

International Coach
tooextracool said:
one of his 50s at headingly came in dead rubber.....regardless we all thought that he had become a more mature player after that series but what happened in his next 6 test matches certainly didnt emphasise that......
Yes, but in SL you can hardly blame him, as he was on turning pitches with Murali up the other end - none of the batsmen exactly covered themselves in glory, because you can't play any top class spinner with ease in turning conditions like those. He actually had the 5th highest average on the tour, and no-one averaged anywhere near 40 (Vaughan was highest with 36). He was also the best bowler on tour, averaging 24 in very hard conditions for seamers to bowl in, which IMO proves that his bowling is better than you give him credit for.

In WI, as I've already said, while he may have got out to part timers alot, he had still played well until that point.
 

Tom Halsey

International Coach
tooextracool said:
white in his prime was much better though and his performances against the WI and in pakistan show that.
No, Freddy is a much better bowler now than White ever was - it probably started in the SL series.
 

tooextracool

International Coach
Tom Halsey said:
Yes, but that doesn't alter the fact that he batted rather well to get there.
yes but thats what flintoff has been for years.....even if he only scored 6 runs he would probably look brilliant doing it. his problem has always been temperamental, which only recently hes managed to sort out.
 

tooextracool

International Coach
Tom Halsey said:
Yes, but in SL you can hardly blame him, as he was on turning pitches with Murali up the other end - none of the batsmen exactly covered themselves in glory, because you can't play any top class spinner with ease in turning conditions like those. He actually had the 5th highest average on the tour
thats barely something to be proud off....but yes he got better towards the end of that tour.


Tom Halsey said:
He was also the best bowler on tour, averaging 24 in very hard conditions for seamers to bowl in, which IMO proves that his bowling is better than you give him credit for
personally i dont think he was anywhere near as dangerous as his average suggests, most of his wickets came off batsman who had already scored 50+ and got out to accurate balls rather than great bowling.
 

Tom Halsey

International Coach
Yes, they scored 50+, which means he got out batsmen who were set.

Bowling accurately still need to be praised.
 

tooextracool

International Coach
Tom Halsey said:
Yes, they scored 50+, which means he got out batsmen who were set.
yes but how helpful is it if you allowed a batsman to get 60-70 and then got him out,especially considering that on most occasions it was probably the batsman that got himself out....

Tom Halsey said:
Bowling accurately still need to be praised.
yes it does but it was something we had already known about from his world cup campaign and it doesnt necessarily make him a better bowler than craig white.
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
Any way he can be brought into the Indian team? He would make a fantastic opening partner for Pathan and do a far better job than "break down" Zaheer, "compact" Agarkar and "home-turf bully" Balaji.

Well...if there is a "Corporate Cup" (Dalmiya's brainchild?) in Indian doemstic cricket where international players may be invited, he should feature in some team.
 

Tom Halsey

International Coach
tooextracool said:
yes but how helpful is it if you allowed a batsman to get 60-70 and then got him out,especially considering that on most occasions it was probably the batsman that got himself out.....
It's not hi fault the other bowlers let him get to 60-70...
 

Tom Halsey

International Coach
tooextracool said:
yes it does but it was something we had already known about from his world cup campaign and it doesnt necessarily make him a better bowler than craig white.
Ah yes...how brilliant a bowler White was...
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Tom Halsey said:
No, Freddy is a much better bowler now than White ever was - it probably started in the SL series.
No, 'fraid not. Flintoff will never be as good as White if you ask me - he hasn't got the tools.
White at his best was one of the best bowlers of the last 3 or 4 years.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Tom Halsey said:
Ah yes...how brilliant a bowler White was...
No sarcasm should be there, because White when bowling well was a brilliant bowler.
Indeed, there are occasions he still is. Sadly he's hardly bowled at all recently.
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
Richard said:
No sarcasm should be there, because White when bowling well was a brilliant bowler.
Indeed, there are occasions he still is. Sadly he's hardly bowled at all recently.
Delighted to see you're back, Richard, old mate, and still sticking to your guns.

I shan't comment too much on the Freddie debate other to say that over the last 12 months, he has become, to me, the most exciting cricketer I have seen in over a decade.

<quack> Rikki, surely?
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Equally delightable to be conversing again with you LE old pal, old mucker, old buddy, old... and the ever devilish duck, of course.
Not disputing the Flintoff matter, but to talk down White is forgetful and ungreatful AFAIAC.
 

Top