PhoenixFire
International Coach
Pathan = ****e
Clippings of a news report previewing the game showed Pathan doing batting practise in the nets. Now I can not know how long that batting in the nets was but if I was Pathan, I would concentrate on the bowling.Hey Irfan...
Frickin' bowl properly.
That is all.
So to have a shout of getting into the Indian team you need to play for one of the bigger states then? Sounds like a lot of other countries/other sports.A lot of information I get is from the papers. When the report of the first day of the Delhi/Andhra match comes in HT, I'll tell you what I can catch. Delhi is batting first and HT gives very in-depth coverage, rather than who scored how many runs and who took how many wickets. 'Dodda', if that's his name, has often been overshadowed by the likes of Srinath, Prasad, Balaji, Jesuraj, Vinaykumar, NP Singh and now Sreesanth in the South. He's played for a weaker team and hasn't done anything noteworthy, so he may get a shout if he leads the wicket-tally at the end of the season, or Andhra wins the trophy.
That factor isn't as prevalent now as it used to be. Being in the Elite League is quite important because the standard is higher and the selectors understandably pay more attention to it. Sometimes you see talented players scouted and recruited into major teams to bring them into the spotlight (ie Munaf). Sometimes you see players from smaller states get a chance in a Duleep Trophy or Deodhar Trophy match, impress the selectors in attendance, earn a chance in a warm-up or A-level match and stake a claim for national selection that way (ie Dhoni). In short, larger states are still favored somewhat but there are several opportunities for players from smaller states as well, albeit less so in the Plate League.So to have a shout of getting into the Indian team you need to play for one of the bigger states then? Sounds like a lot of other countries/other sports.
The same Delhi team was scoring heavily, and then one of them (Dahiya) retired. That Saurashtra bug seems to have carried on.It was not the first time and it would certainly not be the last time. The Delhi batsmen once again displayed their skill of throwing wickets on a simple batting track in order to keep interest alive in their match against Andhra here on Tuesday.
The same Mayank Tehlan also scored a double century earlier this season. He's one to watch, and may be an A-team prospect.The day was, however, saved by Mayank Tehlan with his unbeaten knock of 91 after Delhi opted to bat first on a dead track.
That's a bizarre selection. Aditya Jain is a part-time bowler, as reports indicate. Delhi already is a bowler short. Now they're missing two bowlers. Rajat Bhatia and Aditya Jain will have to bowl as much as a Nehra or Sharma for Delhi to have any chance of making the knock-outs.After some irresponsible batting by the top order, Delhi finished at 247 for five. Aditya Jain, who replaced Ashish Nehra for the match, was unbeaten on 21.
Chopra has been in good form this season, but Dhawan has been patchy. Seeing these two get out to spinners so early is disappointing.When Delhi started their innings, openers Aakash Chopra and Shikhar Dhawan never gave an impression of getting out till they gifted their wickets to the Andhra spinners. Chopra (15) was the first to go when he was caught at forward short-leg by Manoj Sai off off-spinner Md Faiq. Dhawan followed him to the pavilion with no addition to the total when he failed to judge the turn of a Y Lakshmana Kishore delivery and offered his pads without keeping his bat along, and the umpire did not hesitate to raise the finger.
Tehlan's mature shot selection shows the Delhi batsmen can also score runs. As for Manhas, he's been in the scene for a long time, and hasn't converted too many FC starts. He's a very good List-A batsman, and should be a contender for the India A team and even the national team, with his consistent performances in limited-overs matches, where averages are crunched.At this point Tehlan took up the challenge and showed some extraordinary maturity in his selection of shots. Skipper Manhas also played some attractive shots at the other end. Manhas played positive cricket, not hesitating to sweep the spinners right from the start.
This is terrible. He's just biding his time, waiting for a wicket to fall. That's not what we want to see in an India prospect.Faiq, who kept to his middle and leg stump line, finally proved lucky when the Delhi skipper picked substitute Sumanth for catch practice at square-leg.
DK is the bowler in the spotlight. He seems a bowler similar to Venkatesh Prasad. The beanpole from Karnataka had little pace, but those are still big shoes to fill.Virat Kohli (33) chased a wide ball outside the off-stump from speedster Kalyana Krishna to gift Andhra the fourth wicket of the day. The Andhra speedster was again rewarded for his hard work when Rajat Bhatia failed to read an in-cutter and saw his off-stump uprooted while trying to leave a ball.
Oh brother! We complain about the weakness in India's best players when they're fielding. Not surprising that Delhi players are usually pathetic outfielders. The BCCI should look into this sooner than later. It's hindering the progress of the game in India.The credit should go to the Andhra players for keeping their composure despite getting no support from the wicket or the outfield. The condition of the outfield is so pathetic that it was almost impossible for the fielding side to stop even the simplest of drives. Just who would be responsible if a player picks up a serious injury trying to field here? That’s a question the Andhra Cricket Association needs to answer.
With teams like Andhra, it's expected. There's nothing special about Andhra, as they're not tournament winners. Any player from there has to be a heavy run-scorer or a leading wicket-taker. Railways is a decent team, not as prolific as Mumbai or TN or Baroda or Delhi, but they won a tournament and their strike bowler led the wickets table, and also scored heavily for his team. That got JP Yadav into the national team. Likewise, the victory of UP in the next season got Suresh Raina, RP Singh, Piyush Chawla and Pravin Kumar noticed. Most Mumbai players get noticed, but somehow, have never been given a fair try in the recent past.That factor isn't as prevalent now as it used to be. Being in the Elite League is quite important because the standard is higher and the selectors understandably pay more attention to it. Sometimes you see talented players scouted and recruited into major teams to bring them into the spotlight (ie Munaf). Sometimes you see players from smaller states get a chance in a Duleep Trophy or Deodhar Trophy match, impress the selectors in attendance, earn a chance in a warm-up or A-level match and stake a claim for national selection that way (ie Dhoni). In short, larger states are still favored somewhat but there are several opportunities for players from smaller states as well, albeit less so in the Plate League.
Let's just hope that never happens. It would be the final phase of the disintegration of the national ODI team. It was a long time ago when the Sourav/Sachin partnership ruled, then fielding, then McGrath and Lee, then Wasim and Waqar (then Akhtar and Sami), then Pollock and Donald, then Vaas and Dilhara, then Bond and Tuffey, ended their rule. It's past it's best, and it makes no sense to go back so far.adharcric said:1) Sehwag may finally get the axe in the one-day team unless he shows consistency right away. Vengsarkar and co. are losing patience.
2) Ganguly is the favorite to return as an opener in the one-day team. Remember the days of the Sourav-Sachin partnership?
While that's a good thing, it would be absolutely foolish to drop Irfan permanently, as he was once a leading strike bowler, and he's got age, skill and build on his side. Irfan, for all his problems, is still way ahead of all the other seamers in this team, bar Zaheer.3) The selectors are impressed with Joginder Sharma's success in the domestic season and he may get a call-up. Pathan is in danger if he continues to struggle for Baroda.
It doesn't serve any purpose. Even a fully-fit Yuvraj doesn't add much value to the team. A less-than-fully-fit Yuvraj is a liability.4) Yuvraj Singh is recovering well and should be fit soon. Good news.
Now that's a good thing.5) Every member of the test squad will play in the final round of the Ranji Trophy.
Yet they are two of the greatest one-day openers of all-time. Ganguly looks focused again so he's definitely a better option than Sehwag, who fires once in a year and lives on for his elusive "match-winning ability".Let's just hope that never happens. It would be the final phase of the disintegration of the national ODI team. It was a long time ago when the Sourav/Sachin partnership ruled, then fielding, then McGrath and Lee, then Wasim and Waqar (then Akhtar and Sami), then Pollock and Donald, then Vaas and Dilhara, then Bond and Tuffey, ended their rule. It's past it's best, and it makes no sense to go back so far.
Irfan should be dropped until he regains his bowling rhythm. He has immense potential but if his rhythm isn't spot on, he's a huge liability at that pace.Arjun said:While that's a good thing, it would be absolutely foolish to drop Irfan permanently, as he was once a leading strike bowler, and he's got age, skill and build on his side. Irfan, for all his problems, is still way ahead of all the other seamers in this team, bar Zaheer.
Excuse me? Yuvraj was our best one-day batsman in 2006. He's also our best fielder. He can also bowl useful part-time spin. Get some sleep Arjun.Arjun said:It doesn't serve any purpose. Even a fully-fit Yuvraj doesn't add much value to the team. A less-than-fully-fit Yuvraj is a liability.
For once, we agree.Arjun said:Now that's a good thing.
What great thing have they ever done? For all the hype, they've not won enough tournaments. In their last few years, very few. For all the fuss about Ganguly's performance, nothing suggests he can get back so easily at such a crucial position in the team. In fact, Ganguly shouldn't even be in the ODI side, with the likes of Gambhir and Jadhav also scoring as many runs and fielding a lot better.Yet they are two of the greatest one-day openers of all-time. Ganguly looks focused again so he's definitely a better option than Sehwag, who fires once in a year and lives on for his elusive "match-winning ability".
But for how long? We've seen the Indian team suffer after he was dropped, when they could have rolled over the current SA side. In form, he served a purpose none of the current frontline players can.Irfan should be dropped until he regains his bowling rhythm. He has immense potential but if his rhythm isn't spot on, he's a huge liability at that pace.
He can't make the top five in the batting order with his batting. He's not the only one who's good on the field. He's no good at all with the ball. There's nothing to suggest a Test opener like Gambhir or an all-rounder like Sharma can't make the team ahead of him. Let Yuvraj earn his place in the top five.Excuse me? Yuvraj was our best one-day batsman in 2006. He's also our best fielder. He can also bowl useful part-time spin.
Very laughable. Are you seriously suggesting India would have rolled over the current SA side if Irfan Pathan played? Even the South African domestic sides on tour gave him a hammering... Sehwag and Ganguly are better options with the ball the way Pathan was bowling in South Africa. You asked how long he should be dropped for - he should be dropped until he shows greater control and consistency with his bowling over a significant period in domestic cricket.Arjun said:But for how long? We've seen the Indian team suffer after he was dropped, when they could have rolled over the current SA side. In form, he served a purpose none of the current frontline players can.
56 centuries and 103 half centuries opening. Enough said. You can talk all you like about the lack of tournament victories, but you can't expect two players to do it by themselves. They shouldn't be held responsible for the lack of application from their team-mates.Arjun said:What great thing have they ever done?
If Yuvraj Singh isn't amongst the best five one day batsmen in India, I'm not here. Sorry.Arjun said:He can't make the top five in the batting order with his batting.
In other news, Paul Collingwood did his job as 6th bowler superbly at AdelaideWe've got several results here. Irfan's form with the ball was dreadful, but Baroda still got 20 UP wickets for less than 300 in both innings. He may not have been effective as a strike bowler, but as the fifth bowler in the team, he did just right, especially in the final innings where his explosive innings of 82 with three sixes won the match for Baroda.
Haryana is one more team close to relegation. Their batsmen have only scored in bits and pieces, shown in their averages. One win with a bonus point can save them. TN have no prospects now, bar Badrinath. It's disappointing to see the league led by a regressive Baroda team, but the return of Irfan Pathan will help a lot. In that other league, Rajasthan's a drop target.We now head into the final round of the Ranji Trophy with Delhi (8 pts), Haryana (7 pts), Tamil Nadu (4 pts) and Uttar Pradesh (4 pts) all trying to avoid relegation. Personally, I hope Tamil Nadu get relegated because they have the least national prospects. Badrinath is already well-known by now; he's a fixture in the A team and should be into the national team before the next season of Ranji Trophy. Getting relegated to Plate League really hurts prospects because they are generally ignored, so let's hope Baroda can defeat TN and UP can get past Andhra. This round should be a good one with all the big boys returning to action. Sehwag is another man to watch since he's under immense pressure. Unless he can score some runs for Delhi versus Haryana, he really doesn't deserve to play in the one-day series against the West Indies.
Well, look at the performances of Munaf Patel and VRV Singh. While Singh bowled several overs, he didn't take too many wickets, and ended with an average similar to one expected of Irfan. Munaf wasn't even fit enough to bowl in the second innings and took just one wicket. Neither of them deserved a place in the national side, ahead of Harbhajan or a batsman. At least Irfan could have scored some extra runs, or even done alright opening the innings. Even Dinesh Karthik scored a few in the last match!Very laughable. Are you seriously suggesting India would have rolled over the current SA side if Irfan Pathan played? Even the South African domestic sides on tour gave him a hammering... Sehwag and Ganguly are better options with the ball the way Pathan was bowling in South Africa. You asked how long he should be dropped for - he should be dropped until he shows greater control and consistency with his bowling over a significant period in domestic cricket.
The bottom line is that they didn't win tournaments. Junior and Gilly did. Gibbs and Kirsten did. Hayden and Gilly do and so do Gilchrist and his current partner. When they've won so few tournaments over the last few years, they're a lot less likely to win tournaments now. Statistics don't transform into tournament victories. Even teams with lesser players like Sri Lanka and New Zealand have defeated the Indians repeatedly in those years. While we all agree Sehwag's form warrants a drop, there's no need to take a backward step as this. There are three in-form openers (Gambhir, Chopra and Robin Uthappa) who are worth a shot in the ODI side now, and fit the bill well.56 centuries and 103 half centuries opening. Enough said. You can talk all you like about the lack of tournament victories, but you can't expect two players to do it by themselves. They shouldn't be held responsible for the lack of application from their team-mates.
If Yuvraj Singh is one of India's best ODI batsmen, it just sums up the Indians' ODI problems in those years. He averages a wee bit over 30 and sometimes less, and has very few centuries scored. There's nothing to suggest he can match a Tendulkar, Dravid or even Laxman, and it shows up against Test class bowling units.If Yuvraj Singh isn't amongst the best five one day batsmen in India, I'm not here. Sorry.