You cannot help it if they selectors are in love with him. But people seem to think he has improved his keeping a bit and that he should be given as many oppurtunities as possible to showcase that to the selectors.Arjun said:If you've been reading the papers, Ganguly has been ruled out of the Challenger Trophy with more or less the same problem as Sachin. The West Zone selection has been an all-start combination, but it seems Sachin, Agarkar, Zaheer and Irfan may miss the tie. Not to mention the selectors seem to have shut out all other keepers, by picking Parthiv again- I know this is a common grouse among fans, but there is a better keeper playing for Mumbai who's missing out.
The selectors only think of three keepers, which isn't a good thing. There are so many specialist keepers in India who miss out. Mumbai's Vinayak Samant is the next best wicketkeeper after the now-retired Nayan Mongia and has kept to his team's spinners very well, but doesn't even make a West Zone selection- even his batting is very under-rated, and adds to his keeping very well. As for batting, only Dhoni's batting makes any difference, and also that of Pankaj Dharmani of Punjab- the others don't count.honestbharani said:You cannot help it if they selectors are in love with him. But people seem to think he has improved his keeping a bit and that he should be given as many oppurtunities as possible to showcase that to the selectors.
Amol Mazumdar was a very consistent scorer for Mumbai for a very long time. He can hold one end up for a long time and build vital partnerships, and has the temperament to play a long innings. However, he's often missed out simply because he played for Mumbai (After all, Noel Who played for India once) and the Indian middle-order was often jam-packed and there was no place even on the bench. Now he's missed out on a West Zone selection, while some unknown relative of BCCI secretary Niranjan Shah, who's played for Saurashtra and done nothing of note, made the team.honestbharani said:I am interested about Mazumdar. Is he Amol Mazumdar? He was predicted to be the next Sanjay Manjrekar. what happened?
Dharmani is a bit of a stylist (not so much as VVS Laxman) and bats in the middle-order. He is a regular wicketkeeper for Punjab and has been keeping for over ten years, but hardly got a look-in for India. He made the Indian team in 1996 only as a batsman, and he travelled to South Africa at the end of the year with the Indian team, but again, missed out on making the XI. His batting counts for Punjab, and he won a match in a tough spot when they played against Mumbai last year in the Ranji semifinal. What may go against him is that he's only been wicketkeeping in half the matches he's played and he's over 30.honestbharani said:What is up with Dharmani? I thought he should have made the Indian side as soon as Mongia retired or was forced out with all the match fixing drama.
Well, classic BCCI there. And shame about Dharmani. HOw good was his keeping?Arjun said:Amol Mazumdar was a very consistent scorer for Mumbai for a very long time. He can hold one end up for a long time and build vital partnerships, and has the temperament to play a long innings. However, he's often missed out simply because he played for Mumbai (After all, Noel Who played for India once) and the Indian middle-order was often jam-packed and there was no place even on the bench. Now he's missed out on a West Zone selection, while some unknown relative of BCCI secretary Niranjan Shah, who's played for Saurashtra and done nothing of note, made the team.
Look at this page to read more about Niranjan Shah junior. Anyway, I can't say much about Dharmani's keeping, except that Punjab haven't always had a problem bowling teams out recently- his keeping didn't make the news for the wrong reasons. That Himachal keeper is suspect- he used to be an opener for Haryana not too long ago, then he shifted to HP, and started keepign for them- one more Vikram Rathour.honestbharani said:Well, classic BCCI there. And shame about Dharmani. HOw good was his keeping?