marc71178
Eyes not spreadsheets
chris.hinton said:why do you have to act like a snob to everyone
Why do you never ever make sense?
chris.hinton said:why do you have to act like a snob to everyone
actually, he does make sense.marc71178 said:Why do you never ever make sense?
In that sense you're right, it helps the selectors bring lower-division talents into contention. Just seems more interesting when the best are facing the best, rather than a Jharkand star facing a third-class Bihar attack, even if it means the Jharkand star has an opportunity to prove himself (which is very important, I agree).Arjun said:The Ranji/ROD events test out everyone, so you can broaden your frame as selector. Then, the best of the lot can get into Deodhar and Duleep teams, and finally, the senior and reserve teams get picked. Every level counts, or else, we would find extras from West Zone in the Indian team ahead of MS Dhoni, while average specialists would make the North Zone side ahead of Joginder sharma, while UP's Pravin Kumar wouldn't even get a look-in.
none of the leading bowlers of TN were playing in that match. No Jesuraj,Ramkumar,Balaji and on the batting front, Sriram was missing.Arjun said:Railways won their quarter against TN by– guess what– ONE run. Yadav finally had something to show this time, with two wickets for 42 and a score over 50 (although a slow one, with one six) in this match. Bangar, bowling first-change, was taken for 58 runs but picked up a middle-order wicket, and gave Railways a smashing start, scoring 21 off 16, even as his partner Amit Pagnis got past 50. For TN, the bowlers were short of expectations while among the batsmen, Hemang Badani scored 70. Must have been one eventful match, and it's a pity it wasn't televised.
In the battle of the tykes, Uttar Pradesh crushed Karnataka by 8 (or 7?) wickets, with seamers Srivastava and Pravin Kumar taking five wickets between them. This time, Kumar didn't open the batting (and didn't get to bat at all) but decent chunks by SK Shukla and Jyoti Prasad Yadav took UP to the next stage.
It's really, really, really difficult to go in for a pace attack where all your bowlers are fast. Even the West Indies couldn't keep that up. There's not much wrong when you have a bowler who swings and cuts the ball, as long as it works. Look at any pace attack– not all the bowlers are fast. The South Africans are an example– just Nel and maybe Ntini are actually fast.adharcric said:Cricinfo indicated in their season-end "Top 5 Stars" article that Pravin Kumar cuts and swings the ball but it doesn't seem like he's too pacy. He may do well in domestic cricket, but you need swing, pace or exceptional control to do it at the international level. This is why I wasn't the biggest fan of JP Yadav, he was supposed to have exceptional control and only that and when he got selected he bowled too many boundary balls. Hopefully Pravin has a little extra in him. Shib Paul also seems like a McGrath-type bowler with extremely good control, he stuffed up England in that warm-up match. Still, he's not too pacy so his chances for selection aren't too strong, especially with the current crop of talents who can swing the ball with pace.