vvk said:
Nehra is not a suitable one day cricket - cannot bat or field, and is way too loose with the ball.
Give me a break. He was the best bowler for the Indian side throughout the series! And if that's not enough, he got two run-outs with accurate throws, one smashing the stumps!
vvk said:
Murali Kartik in for Amit Mishra.
Enough of that negative line and the no-balls. Mishra bowls for wickets and uses a lot of variations, ad even gets a lot more turn. He's done well playing abroad too.
Rotation.
Pratyush said:
You try youngsters slowly, not over haul a team...
Basically, there are five seniors (Nehra, Sachin, Sehwag, Harbhajan and Dravid) who can help the youngsters. These newbies are fresh, they're playing for a win, they can play as a team and support the main men.
When Pakistan were out of the World Cup a lot earlier, they dropped their TOP EIGHT PLAYERS, yet
won the next tournament in which they played- they only had Youhana, Younis Khan and Razzaq!
When your main team, full strength, are playing minnow-class cricket, what is the harm in doing an overhaul? Besides, the India-A team are a more balanced and better-organised side than their senior counterparts.
That bowling attack is not as weak as it looks. Fans said that about most bowling attacks that Indin batsmen faced- only to fall cheaply to them- New Zealand minus Bond, for instance. And what great thing has a full-strength attack done? Besides, look at that last name- that adds a long-missing ingredient to the attack- PACE.