• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Gilchrist v Dhoni

Whom would you pick in your team?


  • Total voters
    91

Migara

International Coach
AUS 2001-2005 WC: Lee, McGrath, Gillespie, Warne/Hogg, Watson/Harvey

SA 99 WC: Donald, Pollock, Elworthy/Boje, Klusener, Kallis

PAK 99 WC: Wasim, Akthar, Razzaq, Mahmood, Saqlain

NZ 99 WC: Allot, Cairns, Nash, Harris, Larsen (although u could argue it probably only suited the then English conditions)

PAK 2005/06: Akhtar, Asif, Rana, Razzaq, Afridi/Malik

SA currently: Steyn, Parnell, Kallis, Morkel, Botha, VDM

AUS currently: Lee, Johnson, Siddle/Bracken, Hauritz, Watson/Hopes
Jayasuriya better tan all of them as a bowler
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
And that's all Gilchrist has done? Doesn't explain his prelim record then. In 03 and 07 he played well pretty much all the way through.
Was referring to '07- he was really rather poor up until the final.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I have seen Jayasuriya take fifers and change the course of games with the ball. Given that I am yet to see either Hauritz or Van Der Merwe do it as yet and given that Sanath has been around and done it for far far longer than these two have, I don't see why it can be conveniently brushed aside as bias at all.......
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I think you were watching a different world cup mate. He averaged 38 @ 93 in the prelims, and scored 149 in the final.
Pfft. No, I was watching the same tournament. Gilly scored nothing against anyone of note until the final. Those runs largely came against Scotland, the Netherlands and Bangladesh.
 

GGG

State Captain
Agree.



Why do you think keeping is so important? How much more valuable is a great keeper compared to an average one in runs saved and wickets taken? I've always believed that keeper fielding is relatively unimportant in one day cricket. Keeping skills are a lot more valuable in tests because in tests,

-keepers take a higher % of catches
-bowlers bowl more aggressive and unpredictable line/lengths (more bouncers, balls down leg etc)
- degraded and unpredictable pitch conditons

I think a Ponting, Gibbs type of ground fielder adds more value in ODIs (over replacement level player) than a great glove man. They certainly save more runs than keeper, effect runouts, take catches.
oh sorry I didn't actually notice "all time ODI team", just read the title and presumed "test matches", would still pick Gilchrist.
 

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
Pfft. No, I was watching the same tournament. Gilly scored nothing against anyone of note until the final. Those runs largely came against Scotland, the Netherlands and Bangladesh.
No they didn't. Check again. His runs didn't plop out against weaker teams and fail against the others. He scored runs pretty much throughout regardless of who he was playing. In the WC you don't play the best in the world until the very end, really. Here are Australia's matches in 07 and how he scored:

Match #1:
Scotland
Gilchrist: 46 runs @ 83.63

Match #2:
Netherlands
Gilchrist: 57 runs @ 89.06

Match #3:
South Africa
Gilchrist: 42 runs @ 100

Match #4:
West Indies
Gilchrist: 7 runs @ 77.77

Match #5:
Bangladesh
Gilchrist: 59 runs @ 134.09

Match #6:
England
Gilchrist: 27 runs @ 72.97

Match #7:
Ireland
Gilchrist: 34 runs @ 136.00

Match #8:
Sri Lanka
Gilchrist: 30 runs @ 61.22

Match #9:
New Zealand
Gilchrist: 1 run @ 50

Match #10:
South Africa
Gilchrist: 1 run @ 20

Match #11:
Sri Lanka
Gilchrist: 149 runs @ 143.26

---

So, as you can see, he didn't beat up on anybody until the final. He scored consistently throughout.
 

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
Why is Dhoni somehow faulted for the not outs when it is seen as a strength of Bevan?
Is it? Probably has to do with the fact that often than not, when Bevan made a contribution, he was the thread holding the team together. Some of those situations were intense and dire; him remaining not-out in many of those situations would be the only reason I see for it.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
No they didn't. Check again. His runs didn't plop out against weaker teams and fail against the others. He scored runs pretty much throughout regardless of who he was playing.


Match #3:
South Africa
Gilchrist: 42 runs @ 100

Match #4:
West Indies
Gilchrist: 7 runs @ 77.77

Match #6:
England
Gilchrist: 27 runs @ 72.97

Match #8:
Sri Lanka
Gilchrist: 30 runs @ 61.22

Match #9:
New Zealand
Gilchrist: 1 run @ 50

Match #10:
South Africa
Gilchrist: 1 run @ 20

Match #11:
Sri Lanka
Gilchrist: 149 runs @ 143.26

---

So, as you can see, he didn't beat up on anybody until the final. He scored consistently throughout.
109 @ 18.17 is hardly consistent.
 

Migara

International Coach
:huh:

Chris Harris?



250 ODI's played
4739 runs @ 29
203 wickets @ 37.40 Economy 4.28

Who are you talking about?
Nope. Paul Harris of SAF.

Even Chris Harris has inferior record to Jaya.

13,000 Runs @ 31
300+ wickets at 36 Econ 4.7

Better batsman
Better bowler
Harris better fielder, but not by much.
Better captain

But we are comparing their bowling BTW
 
Last edited:

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
109 @ 18.17 is hardly consistent.
What? He scores a decent amount in pretty much every match bar 3; one of them which is ironically a minnow (WIndies), another when the last game of the prelims was basically a scratch match (NZ) and only 1 really relevant bad score against S.Africa in the semis. Scored throughout, regardless of who. To say he was carried to a final is revisionism.
 
Last edited:

Athlai

Not Terrible
Nope. Paul Harris of SAF.

Even Chris Harris has inferior record to Jaya.

13,000 Runs @ 31
300+ wickets at 36 Econ 4.7

Better batsman
Better bowler
Harris better fielder, but not by much.
Better captain

But we are comparing their bowling BTW
Why would I have been talking about Paul Harris who you hadn't mentioned at all instead of the player from NZ you highlighted.

Wickets are irrelevant as you have already noted he did play 400 ODI's to Harris' 250 :)
The Average and Economy would be the stats way to fight this out and Harris economy rate is far far superior.

Jayasuriya by a fair bit the better batsman
Harris better bowler
Harris better fielder
Both equally awesome in terms of old men running around on the cricket field like young men.
 

Top