Migara
International Coach
Some one I have seen mentioned Hauritz, van der Merwe etc. Jayasuriya much better than themJayasuriya is a world-class bowler now?
Some one I have seen mentioned Hauritz, van der Merwe etc. Jayasuriya much better than themJayasuriya is a world-class bowler now?
Jayasuriya better tan all of them as a bowlerAUS 2001-2005 WC: Lee, McGrath, Gillespie, Warne/Hogg, Watson/Harvey
SA 99 WC: Donald, Pollock, Elworthy/Boje, Klusener, Kallis
PAK 99 WC: Wasim, Akthar, Razzaq, Mahmood, Saqlain
NZ 99 WC: Allot, Cairns, Nash, Harris, Larsen (although u could argue it probably only suited the then English conditions)
PAK 2005/06: Akhtar, Asif, Rana, Razzaq, Afridi/Malik
SA currently: Steyn, Parnell, Kallis, Morkel, Botha, VDM
AUS currently: Lee, Johnson, Siddle/Bracken, Hauritz, Watson/Hopes
Was referring to '07- he was really rather poor up until the final.And that's all Gilchrist has done? Doesn't explain his prelim record then. In 03 and 07 he played well pretty much all the way through.
Take of the Sri Lankan-tinted glasses IMO.Some one I have seen mentioned Hauritz, van der Merwe etc. Jayasuriya much better than them
I think you were watching a different world cup mate. He averaged 38 @ 93 in the prelims, and scored 149 in the final.Was referring to '07- he was really rather poor up until the final.
Pfft. No, I was watching the same tournament. Gilly scored nothing against anyone of note until the final. Those runs largely came against Scotland, the Netherlands and Bangladesh.I think you were watching a different world cup mate. He averaged 38 @ 93 in the prelims, and scored 149 in the final.
So you are suggesting that Hauritz > Jayasuriya or VDM > Jayasuriya?Take of the Sri Lankan-tinted glasses IMO.
3 ODIs vs 400 odd? And all the matches played against BAN. We are talking of ODI bowlingHarris > Jayasuriya with the ball tbh. Better hairdo as well.
oh sorry I didn't actually notice "all time ODI team", just read the title and presumed "test matches", would still pick Gilchrist.Agree.
Why do you think keeping is so important? How much more valuable is a great keeper compared to an average one in runs saved and wickets taken? I've always believed that keeper fielding is relatively unimportant in one day cricket. Keeping skills are a lot more valuable in tests because in tests,
-keepers take a higher % of catches
-bowlers bowl more aggressive and unpredictable line/lengths (more bouncers, balls down leg etc)
- degraded and unpredictable pitch conditons
I think a Ponting, Gibbs type of ground fielder adds more value in ODIs (over replacement level player) than a great glove man. They certainly save more runs than keeper, effect runouts, take catches.
3 ODIs vs 400 odd? And all the matches played against BAN. We are talking of ODI bowling
No they didn't. Check again. His runs didn't plop out against weaker teams and fail against the others. He scored runs pretty much throughout regardless of who he was playing. In the WC you don't play the best in the world until the very end, really. Here are Australia's matches in 07 and how he scored:Pfft. No, I was watching the same tournament. Gilly scored nothing against anyone of note until the final. Those runs largely came against Scotland, the Netherlands and Bangladesh.
Is it? Probably has to do with the fact that often than not, when Bevan made a contribution, he was the thread holding the team together. Some of those situations were intense and dire; him remaining not-out in many of those situations would be the only reason I see for it.Why is Dhoni somehow faulted for the not outs when it is seen as a strength of Bevan?
109 @ 18.17 is hardly consistent.No they didn't. Check again. His runs didn't plop out against weaker teams and fail against the others. He scored runs pretty much throughout regardless of who he was playing.
Match #3:
South Africa
Gilchrist: 42 runs @ 100
Match #4:
West Indies
Gilchrist: 7 runs @ 77.77
Match #6:
England
Gilchrist: 27 runs @ 72.97
Match #8:
Sri Lanka
Gilchrist: 30 runs @ 61.22
Match #9:
New Zealand
Gilchrist: 1 run @ 50
Match #10:
South Africa
Gilchrist: 1 run @ 20
Match #11:
Sri Lanka
Gilchrist: 149 runs @ 143.26
---
So, as you can see, he didn't beat up on anybody until the final. He scored consistently throughout.
Nope. Paul Harris of SAF.
Chris Harris?
250 ODI's played
4739 runs @ 29
203 wickets @ 37.40 Economy 4.28
Who are you talking about?
What? He scores a decent amount in pretty much every match bar 3; one of them which is ironically a minnow (WIndies), another when the last game of the prelims was basically a scratch match (NZ) and only 1 really relevant bad score against S.Africa in the semis. Scored throughout, regardless of who. To say he was carried to a final is revisionism.109 @ 18.17 is hardly consistent.
Why would I have been talking about Paul Harris who you hadn't mentioned at all instead of the player from NZ you highlighted.Nope. Paul Harris of SAF.
Even Chris Harris has inferior record to Jaya.
13,000 Runs @ 31
300+ wickets at 36 Econ 4.7
Better batsman
Better bowler
Harris better fielder, but not by much.
Better captain
But we are comparing their bowling BTW