James
Cricket Web Owner
http://forum.cricketweb.net/announcement.php?f=10C_C said:F*ck logic or reasoning or even being neutral enough to ask for evidence .
http://forum.cricketweb.net/announcement.php?f=10C_C said:F*ck logic or reasoning or even being neutral enough to ask for evidence .
Post #129, as well, tho I'm sure you've been informed anyway - but then so has C_C... repeatedly.James said:
Well if it was a shot@ Sehwag then still you should be embarrassed for doing so because he isn't here to defend himself.Deja moo said:Talking of IQ levels, I guess this should clear up any doubts as to yours :
http://forum.cricketweb.net/showpost.php?p=317140&postcount=81
and the 28th post on : http://www.sportnetwork.net/boards/read/s119.php?f=118&i=109681&t=109348&sid=119
Doesnt alter the fact that he would never have dared start such threads on this forum. But he does so on a platform where the members actually encourage his ridiculing of certain players. Which makes the pot shot justified. As for him not being present here, I dont see many of the international players against whom routine shots are taken, present here. That doesnt seem to stop anybody, including you and meSanz said:Well if it was a shot@ Sehwag then still you should be embarrassed for doing so because he isn't here to defend himself.![]()
I didn't know Sehwag309 enough and I dont care if his real name was Rajeev, chandrasekhar or Mohammadad. You can continue with your investigation.![]()
I think it is because Freddie wasn't such a big player in that tour. He was basically a walking wicket in the tests, although I think that tour marked a bit of a renaissance in his bowling. That was the first time I ever saw him bowl at 140+ ks an hour.Pedro Delgado said:I think Sanz means nobody really gives a feck who Freddie is over there.
They are good enough to bust match fixing racquets. I would have thought they would be competent enough to investigate these incidents. Point is, the DDCA member says it was a cardboard box and given the security arrangements for a match in the same series in Chennai (which I watched) I think he is right, there really is no way that I can understand how a guy could have carried a pellet gun into the ground. The fact is that they decided to play it down then and are playing it up now, which is stupid, basically. They are wrong both times. Either they should have reported about it then and made sure people took action or they should have kept mum now.Langeveldt said:Do you mean the ICC or the police? Everyone knows the ICC is totally incompetant, and I'm not sure what the attitudes of the Indian police would have been.. Bit of a waste of time IMO..
James said:
Is anyone actually offended by a line of asterisks with a letter on either side of them anyway? I understand stopping people from using other characters to get around it, but come on...honestbharani said:personally, I think these words are not even half as bad as some of the stupid stuff people come up with here.
Then how do you know? You're the only other person who has mentioned those lines anywhere.Sanz said:anyone with decent IQ would first check out the timing of my post here @CW and the post there @the link. Also If you are still not sure Please feel free to contact the moderators of both the forums to find out the fact.
Neither am I member of that forum, nor is my name Rajeev.
How the hell I know how it ended up @ that forum. May be Rajeev still visits the websites, may be he came on his own.Arjun said:Then how do you know? You're the only other person who has mentioned those lines anywhere.
Yeah and no country should tour England either.Jace11 said:Maybe England shouldn't tour India and Pakistan. There are clear dangers of terrorist attacks by extremists, criminals etc in such lawless countries. Hopefully the first incident will be minor but enough for them to call the tour off. This kind of behaviour cannot go unpunished and the best way to punish them is to give them nothing to watch, nothing to shoot at and nothing to blow up.
Bowler shot with airgun during matchCricket doesn't need these kinds of fans, snipers or suicide bomber pitch invasions.![]()
One of the most ignorant posts I've seen.Jace11 said:Maybe England shouldn't tour India and Pakistan. There are clear dangers of terrorist attacks by extremists, criminals etc in such lawless countries. Hopefully the first incident will be minor but enough for them to call the tour off. This kind of behaviour cannot go unpunished and the best way to punish them is to give them nothing to watch, nothing to shoot at and nothing to blow up.
Cricket doesn't need these kinds of fans, snipers or suicide bomber pitch invasions.![]()
Umm only if goes that far.C_C said:Slanderous behaviour can see sanctions levied against you in a court of law.
But there is proof that something did happen, it is obvious you seem to miss that.C_C said:So now yer a lip reader ? Flintoff mouthed the word 'i've been shot' that only NOW people start to notice, eh ? Nobody-not a frigging soul- noticed that when the incident occured.
Do you know what 'suggestable' means ? I think you are being very suggestable here.
And clearly didnt make it up ? Well boyo, we have no evidence to believe that !
He could've been shot, he could've been mistaken, he could be lying through his teeth.
We just dont know .
So instead of taking sides because you feel that way i suggest you let the brain do the thinking - ie, wait for evidence and both sides of the story !
PS : I clearly got what he was insinuating - he said that he thinks Flintoff is right because play stoppage confirms what Flintoff is saying (sic).
He's acknowledging something happened. But he's saying that noone here knows WHAT exactly happened..Craig said:But there is proof that something did happen, it is obvious you seem to miss that.