marc71178 said:It doesn't matter if the pitches were different (since it's the same pitch for both sides)]
First of all you should KNOW what is being discussed and is being compared and only THEN should you come up with a post.
Bizzare claimed that England batsmen would have done better than the Indian batsmen against NZ had they played recently just because they had done better the last time they played in NZ! Here you will have 2 take into account the change in the nature of the pitch, English batsmen may or may not have done better BUT 2 say that a different pitches doesn't matter since its the same pitch for both sides SHOWS where you stand:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
][/QUOTE] And yes the bowling attacks are different, but so are the 2 sides. No matter what you say, India crumbled in NZ yet last time England played there they fought a good drawn series. [/QUOTE]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I pointed out that England faced a NZ team with a different bowling lineup (Bond and Tuffy didn't played against Eng) .Here i was comparing the same side i.e New Zealand in different time period with a different composition, therefore the comparison between the 2 series (NZ/Eng & NZ/Ind) becomes more difficult.
Understand???
Last edited: