Didn't Prior only get on tour as a second keeper though? Then when on tour, the number of options are automatically fewer.Prior was picked because they thought he could bat IMO... otherwise him and Jones wouldn't have been in together.
Might have been selected more for the batting, but his bowling had to have an effect, hence where he ended up in the actual team.And Blackwell was certainly initially selected for batting more than for bowling - because he happened to have scored a few runs in 2 televised games, and Dermot Reeve decided to get on the selectors' case about him.
I don't think he ever got into a Test party as a 2nd 'keeper...? And recently it only seems to have been Test parties who've had 2nd 'keepers (see here, here, here, here, here, here, here ANYWHERE - keep your hands and arms inside the carpet... [only any good if you've seen Disney's Aladdin]) so I really think Prior was picked as a "he's a big-hitter" batsman, even though Duncan has displayed an at-times-frustrating interest in having a wicketkeeper open, which coupled with "it took Gilchrist X games to get going as an opener" really did make me worry.Didn't Prior only get on tour as a second keeper though? Then when on tour, the number of options are automatically fewer.
An opinion that more than a few people held, tbh."Shoaib should be banned for longer than Asif because he drinks alcohol and likes chasing skirt."
That ring any bells?
Since he was selected for Zimbabwe first, when the gloves were clearly the reason, that's got to be when you look from.IIRR the first time he was selected in a proper squad (excluding that Zimbabwe tour where experiment was the name of the game) was Pakistan when four or five players who would've been ahead of him were injured. Trescothick, yet, though, wasn't one (the two opened together in Pakistan). Otherwise I might be inclined to believe the Trescothick-back-up-wicketkeeper might have been the reason.
Really?An opinion that more than a few people held, tbh.
Well Jones was still in that squad, and kept in all the games, while Prior played only when Solanki was rested.Since he was selected for Zimbabwe first, when the gloves were clearly the reason, that's got to be when you look from.
Yes, I think thats part of the reason that he has such a bad reputation, but obviously not all of it. There's no doubt in my mind that if he had settled down a bit earlier, there wouldn't have been nearly as many questions about his commitment.Really?
I mean, I know that sort of thing is much less common than more in Pakistan, but I still think it's a shame if a good number of people will genuinely hold that against you.
If you mean Prior I'm fairly sure we have. Read didn't tour Pakistan or India last winter, despite averaging over 10 runs more per FC innings that Prior who was in both test sqauds. IIRC Dunc justified it on the grounds that Prior "scored his runs more quickly" or somesuch.Thankfully we've not stooped so low as selecting him as a Test back-up.
However, the fact he occasionally wears the gloves and stands behind the stumps must have had a side effect on his call up for the ODI squad, especially seeing as Trescothick withdrew/wasn't selected.
From then on, he was probably retained in the initial squad as he'd only had one game in Zimbabwe and we were losing so many players through injury that Darren Anderton wouldn't have felt out of place getting a call up.
And I always thought his bad reputation was just because of his volatility...Yes, I think thats part of the reason that he has such a bad reputation, but obviously not all of it. There's no doubt in my mind that if he had settled down a bit earlier, there wouldn't have been nearly as many questions about his commitment.
Yes, I know that.Well Jones was still in that squad, and kept in all the games, while Prior played only when Solanki was rested.
Ouch - I obviously tried to block it from my mind and had done until then!If you mean Prior I'm fairly sure we have. Read didn't tour Pakistan or India last winter, despite averaging over 10 runs more per FC innings that Prior who was in both test sqauds. IIRC Dunc justified it on the grounds that Prior "scored his runs more quickly" or somesuch.
There was this great Kiwi leg spinner...what was his name ???who are some great yet forgotten cricketers in your opinion.
There was this great Kiwi leg spinner...what was his name ???
Oh yes and then there was that wonderfully explosive opener in the fifties from England...er...er..
And of course how can one forget that express fast bowler from India...now what was he called ???
How about that soft spoken, polite fast bowler from Australia....I cant seem to remember....