• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

England players and selection discussion thread

LangleyburyCCPlayer

State 12th Man
Pak vs Eng - Brydon Carse in England Test squad for Pakistan, Jack Leach recalled | ESPNcricinfo

Squad picked for Pakistan. I know Pakistan have their problems right now, but the seam bowling battery is far from convincing for Pakistan with no Wood and Anderson/Robinson having been binned in one form or another compared to two years ago. That we are playing Pakistan and NZ, two years after touring there is another bugbear I have. How come we aren't playing Bangladesh or South Africa? Two teams we haven't now toured for some time, especially the former.
I make it that the Covid year in 2020 was the last year we didn’t play a Test series against New Zealand either home or away lol, we played South Africa the same year they toured us, but it is a shame that we don’t seem to bother with Bangladesh, they beat us last time we went there and have only got better since. I’ve said my piece on Jimmy not being there in Pakistan, but at least we knew that he would be riding off into the sunset eventually, that Robinson has been frozen out of the side is a real shame as he’s a terrific bowler, I know county averages mean **** all to Baz and Stokes, but it must rankle that they picked Hull over him (particularly as he’s not too shabby in the ol’ release point stakes!). Carse does seem a strange one, I get that he’s quick (although we’ve seen with so many English fast bowlers that they either break down or become slower) and can bat, but he’s never especially impressed me and @mackembhoy’s report on him doesn’t fill me with confidence even if he’s bound to be rusty
 

LangleyburyCCPlayer

State 12th Man
Lawrence gone, nobody can be too surprised or disappointed at that, but it begs the question, what happens if one of our openers falls down again? Stokes did it against the Windies, but would he be up for it for more than a single innings?
 

LangleyburyCCPlayer

State 12th Man
Woakes will have to hope the pitches in Pakistan have a green tinge, Pakistan are hilarious, but I don’t think even they’d sabotage themselves by preparing a pitch tailor-made for Woakes!
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Watched all of Robinson's bowling yesterday. Bowled 9 overs straight to start with, his figures really didn't do him justice. Unadkat picked up the wickets but Ollie was causing all the problems and had 3 good lbw shouts turned down.

Seems like he'll never play for England again, and whilst he's probably not helped himself some of the time, surely the coaching staff need to take some ownership of it. A real waste because there's no better bowler than him in that squad.
How is it anyone’s fault but his own?
 

Chin Music

State Vice-Captain
Who’s next cab off the rank? Seeing the lengths they went to not pick Lees/Burns/Sibley/Jennings, there aren’t any obvious choices
Surely there is a case of assessing talent with batsmen in the same way as they do bowlers if they are not doing that already? Look at the basic game rather than cold, hard stats?
 

LangleyburyCCPlayer

State 12th Man
Surely there is a case of assessing talent with batsmen in the same way as they do bowlers if they are not doing that already? Look at the basic game rather than cold, hard stats?
I don’t think so, bowlers can produce the odd magic ball that’ll get the best of them out even if they are very raw (not to mention that spinners are on a hiding to nothing really in England), but you won’t get very far as a batter if you can only produce the odd shot here and there, to an extent (Crawley perhaps an exception), I think you still need to do the hard yards to prove yourself if you are a batter
 

LangleyburyCCPlayer

State 12th Man
can't second guess who Stokes has been watching on twitter. McKinney, Jacks, Livingstone.... Moeen?
Plot twist: Will Jacks ends up going, but as a specialist spinner :laugh:
Rob Yates and Ben McKinney opened for the Lions, they’ve been in decent form and can score at a decent lick, they must be close (likewise Singh Dale and Zaman Akhter can’t be a million miles away from a call-up, seeing as they like to go for relatively left-field picks, I’m a tad surprised Carse got the nod ahead of them)
 

kevinw

State Captain
How is it anyone’s fault but his own?
He is a moron, but his stepdad is his current coach and was part of the England set up, so surely there is nobody better to try to get Robinson back on track? Get him fit and on form and he's our best bowler.
 

Chin Music

State Vice-Captain
I don’t think so, bowlers can produce the odd magic ball that’ll get the best of them out even if they are very raw (not to mention that spinners are on a hiding to nothing really in England), but you won’t get very far as a batter if you can only produce the odd shot here and there, to an extent (Crawley perhaps an exception), I think you still need to do the hard yards to prove yourself if you are a batter
I am more thinking of the Duncan Fletcher identification of Michael Vaughan. A highly talented player who had a moderate first class record at the time of his selection. Perhaps such a player simply doesn’t exist at the moment. I am still befuddled that Lawrence was considered the next in line prior to the Sri Lanka series. Respectable player as a middle order squad man, but to be honest, there has to be better if England are really going to kick on.
 

LangleyburyCCPlayer

State 12th Man
I am more thinking of the Duncan Fletcher identification of Michael Vaughan. A highly talented player who had a moderate first class record at the time of his selection. Perhaps such a player simply doesn’t exist at the moment. I am still befuddled that Lawrence was considered the next in line prior to the Sri Lanka series. Respectable player as a middle order squad man, but to be honest, there has to be better if England are really going to kick on.
Think the closest thing you’ll have to that is guys like Crawley being picked and persisted with because of his aggressive nature despite a pretty poor first-class record (his overall FC average is only a tick over his Test average!) but I do think the really left-field picks will mainly be the bowlers. Was there any evidence to suggest Pope would be a successful Test level #3, or was it just a hunch (and a lack of alternatives)?
 

Chin Music

State Vice-Captain
Think the closest thing you’ll have to that is guys like Crawley being picked and persisted with because of his aggressive nature despite a pretty poor first-class record (his overall FC average is only a tick over his Test average!) but I do think the really left-field picks will mainly be the bowlers. Was there any evidence to suggest Pope would be a successful Test level #3, or was it just a hunch (and a lack of alternatives)?
Crawley has obviously lifted his game in the last couple of years, but like Duckett and Pope, their game management leaves me baffled at times. They are no longer new kids on the block, and with him and Pope, they have gone long past the stage where they look like rabbits in the headlights. However, I still have a forlornly hope that they could be a tad more consistent than they are. Pope's issues are defensive of course and they aren't of a level that you would expect of a test number 3, despite the fact that his number there are still reasonably good even if boosted by the big double ton v Ireland.
 

Top