Deja moo
International Captain
Well, good luck.Jamee999 said:I joined this season.
I used to be a *spits* Green.
All I could make out was that Marc was captain, and Hakon was vice.
Well, good luck.Jamee999 said:I joined this season.
I used to be a *spits* Green.
er..apparently not . And perhaps one that wouldnt be consulted/appraised of his role in the team either. Happy cheerleading.Jamee999 said:I'm not an experienced Red am I?
Spit your dummy out. .Deja moo said:Happy cheerleading.
I often used to try to input my influence on team selections, mainly on Steds, though I should try Kennett, coz he does a soft spot for me. I succeded through whinging to Steds at the beginning of the season to let me open the batting in FC, which has now succeded and I regularly do, ousting former opener James Stedman to the no.3 spot.Deja moo said:Could you point out an instance of you eliciting any input from the players ?
Jamee999 said:I joined this season.
I used to be a *spits* Green.
Robertinho said:Grow up Garven, stop whinging.
Definitely!KennyD said:Cloete talks up his bowling. Result? He gets a bowl here and there.
The system works.
Whinged and whinged?age_master said:the whole time you were you whinged and whinged and showed incredibly little team spirit - unlike Lezama who was active even through an extended injury.
you played more FC Innings than i did too through the season....
My role in the team.Deja moo said:er..apparently not . And perhaps one that wouldnt be consulted/appraised of his role in the team either. Happy cheerleading.
Nope, you've got it wrong. read my posts again. I suggested that individual aggression be left to the discretion of the players, not the captains, as seems to be the case here. And since this threrad was created for the purpose of inviting suggestions, I gave mine, and had to elaborate on it a lot to make matters clear, which you interpret as a rant. And, yes, it is not for me to suggest whether you should enjoy it or not, its entirely your decision. All I did was put forth my impressions.FaaipDeOiad said:Is there any point to this rant? You started out by suggesting the new sim should include individual aggression, which the curent one already does, and after that was pointed out you launched into a broad and pointless tirade against the dev league as a whole. If you don't like it, that's fine, and you can not participate. It's perfectly understandable if you think it's pointless, as the only point is that it's meant to be fun, and evidently you don't find it so. So, don't be involved, and those of us who don't think it's pointless and do find it fun will be.
Do carry on... :insert yawning smiley here:PY said:Spit your dummy out. .
If we made it so each player got to choose their tactics we'd never have a league in the first place because there's only a handful of people who are active enough to post them for every game that's played and some of us don't have the time. That's why I enjoy it because I don't have to do much yet I still get to have a little fun out of it.
Give me a B......Give me a L..........Give me an U......Give me an EEEEEEEEEEE........Give me an S. I've been practicing.
A batsman in any game in the world can request from a captain for permission to deal with the game in a manner differing to the captain's tactics, but once you come down to it it's the captain who lays down the law. They, and/or the selectors, say where you bat, how you should bat, when you bowl, where you field, what field you bowl to, etc.Deja moo said:Do carry on... :insert yawning smiley here:
And its simple. The players interested enough to choose tactics may do so before the game. And for those not interested enough/lacking the time, the captain fills in the information for them (since they already seem to be doing so). Now that is simulation.