Magrat Garlick
Rather Mad Witch
Out to Pathan and Zaheer again.
96 all out...dear god, we're worse than Bangladesh...
96 all out...dear god, we're worse than Bangladesh...
Unforetuntately that message seems to have got lost somewhere.lord_of_darkness said:Tactics = work as a unit , Gameplan = win
that should be the basics..
You know that's not what I asked.lord_of_darkness said:Tactics = work as a unit , Gameplan = win
that should be the basics..
I know that should be our primary aim but thats not for me to answer sorry neil.. Btw i would request the vice captain to send in tactics for the final test as the captain is available but 'temporarily unavailable' at the same time..You know that's not what I asked.
Was this sorted?Cloete said:BTW Liam I think you might need to exchange someone for me, I've retired from ODI's.
Just what is going on here? Why can't you tell us the motivation behind the bowling changes and aggression settings chosen (and what were the aggression settings chosen)?lord_of_darkness said:I know that should be our primary aim but thats not for me to answer sorry neil.. Btw i would request the vice captain to send in tactics for the final test as the captain is available but 'temporarily unavailable' at the same time..
Fair..You can't expect us to sit back and not scrutinise when we get annihilated. Something has to be wrong - no one has suggested ulterior motives, merely that it's just not being gone about the right way. We seemed to perform a lot better when Liam simmed the 'A' games - maybe it's just a way of 'playing the game' - worth a think about.
yeh i would understand.. that is why i might have read neil coming on a bit too hard .. but rather it was the frustration..its just hard to take that we continually get hammered all the time, im not sure of the exact stats of our team compared to others but the lack of progression we are showing is disturbing. We know you dont want us to lose lord but i guess we are all just frustrated with losing all the time...
i think its deffinatly something that should b tried.Cloete said:I don't necessarily expect to get a bowl. I mean guys like Marc are probably ahead of me, fair enough too! I just think when India has a big partnership and our bowlers aren't doing too much, we should bring on a part-timer! Doesn't matter who it is, as long as they can roll their arm over, there's always the chance of them breaking a prtnership. If it doesn't work and they're bowling badly after 5 bowlers than that's fine. But it's always worth a try!
How about you take your catches before you start critisising other players in the side!Cloete said:um... ****
Disappointing effort all round apart from Hakon and maybe Liam. Disappointing last 2 tests after that first test offered such promise.
Let's lift our heads, at the end of the day playing India is difficult. Playing India at home is extemely difficult! So we can still be proud.
Just one thing to query, why on earth didn't we try a part-timer?? The Indian batting line-up carved us up once again and it just seems strange that we haven't used ONE part-timer all tour. I'm certainly not suggesting myself, although I'd be happy to, but anyone! Our bowlers are all bowler large amounts of overs and it just seems strange not to ever bring on a part-timer during large partnerships...
Let's put in a big one for the last test though boys!
lord_of_darkness said:Fair..
Im not quite sure but i could think whoever the captain was on the 'A' tour contributed with some tactics which certainly help