Q2. Is it a batting record ?marc71178 said:Good point, sorry.
These are in the correct order. They appear in a World Record.
Q3. Is it an Individual's record ?marc71178 said:
Just to clarify, partnerships are also individual records.marc71178 said:
Correct, this is neither an individual or a partnership World Record.SJS said:Just to clarify, partnerships are also individual records.
5. Does the record belong to a 'white' team ?marc71178 said:No (4)
I mean from a white nation with Australia, NewZealnd England being white, West Indies black and sub continental teams brownmarc71178 said:Yes, I'm assuming by white you mean team wearing whites? (5)
No (6)Steulen said:Is it a Test record?
Oh right, it still is a "white" record, although I don't think we should refer to the records on skin colour.SJS said:I mean from a white nation with Australia, NewZealnd England being white, West Indies black and sub continental teams brown
I did interpret his clarifications to the 'white' question as meaning the team plays in white (i.e., it's not one-day cricket), but it is not a Test record. I therefore assume we're looking for a FC record set by a team from a country primarily inhabited by whites.SJS said:Okay. So what do we have.
There is a team batting world record which is not from a test match(s) and the team in question is a white nation as against a black or a brown one. The digits 37521920172617781128361 , in this very order, appear in the record .