• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Brett Lee is Rubish!

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Richard said:
So that's why he's averaged nearly 70 in God knows how many seasons playing half his games on the most seam-uneven-bounce-friendly deck in The World?
That will have something to do with facing rubbish bowling?
 

Rik

Cricketer Of The Year
marc71178 said:
That will have something to do with facing rubbish bowling?
*Reminds Marc that most CC teams have stronger pace attacks than the England side, mainly because the England side ignores all the bowlers who perform*
 

Langeveldt

Soutie
Rik said:
*Reminds Marc that most CC teams have stronger pace attacks than the England side, mainly because the England side ignores all the bowlers who perform*
Pah, that is dross if ever ive heard it :)

Give some examples (that arent helped by overseas players and colonial guys on grandmothers passports)
 

Rik

Cricketer Of The Year
Langeveldt said:
Pah, that is dross if ever ive heard it :)

Give some examples (that arent helped by overseas players and colonial guys on grandmothers passports)
Bugger Netscape lost it :!(

Right:

Derbyshire: Cork, Dean, Welch
Durham: Harmison, Killeen, Wells (Hamilton if he starts bowling again bowls)
Essex: Cowan, Clarke, Stephenson (Irani if he can bowl)
Glamorgan: Jones, Thomas, Davies
Gloucestershire: Smith, Lewis, Averis, Alleyne
Hampshire: Mullally, Tremlett, Taylor, Morris (untill recently Giddins)
Kent: Saggers, Trott, Sheriyar, Hewitt
Lancashire: Chapple, Martin, Anderson, Hogg, Flintoff, Wood
Leicestershire: DeFreitas, Dagnall, Maddy, Grove, Masters
Middlesex: Gannon, Cook, Bloomfield, Hutchinson, Betts
Northants: Anderson (Rikki), Baker, Cousins, Greenidge, Cawdron, Phillips
Notts: Franks, Logan, Sidebottom, Shreck, Harris
Somerset: Caddick, Johnson, Jones, Laraman, Tucker, Andrew, Francais (until recently Bulbeck)
Surrey: Bicknell, Clarke, Ormond, Tudor, Murtagh, Sampson, (occasionally Hollioake, Butcher)
Sussex: Kirtley, Lewry, Martin-Jenkins, Robinson, Yardy
Warwickshire: Brown, Richardson, Sheikh, Wagg
Worcestershire: Ali, Liptrot, Leatherdale, Malik
Yorkshire: Gough, Hoggard, Kirby, Silverwood, White (if he bowls), McGrath

Not a single overseas or EU passport player there. I certainly think Yorkshire at full strength have a stronger all-round seam attack than England. Maybe I was being a bit extravigant but a lot of these teams have players who have performed better than the England seamers and I'm pretty sure couldn't do worse.
 

Eclipse

International Debutant
Richard said:
So that's why he's averaged nearly 70 in God knows how many seasons playing half his games on the most seam-uneven-bounce-friendly deck in The World?
Forgive me, but I must disagree.
Gilchrist does not have an especially pronounced weakness against the swinging and seaming ball, but any batsman, no matter how good, will do so eventually.
Lehmann is, IMO, far better against seam than almost any player I've ever seen.
Lehmann is a quality player so an avrage of 70 over long period's does not supprise me.

Never the less a quality quick bowler who bowl's short of a length and get's bounce outside offstump will trouble Lehmann.

He rarely play's a deffensive shot to those kind off ball's early on he just nibel's at them with an angeld bat.
 

Craig

World Traveller
Which if you have plenty of slip fielders in, it will be like christmas, catching practice, Bastille day, Independence Day and all birthday's for them.

It will be easy slip catching for them. If they dont catch it, well shoot them.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
marc71178 said:
That will have something to do with facing rubbish bowling?
Remember the typical Headingley wicket makes seamers that are rubbish elsewhere into pretty useful ones.
And it makes good ones into fantastic ones. And fantastic ones into near-immortals...
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
luckyeddie said:
The power of the double negative - always gets 'em.
I sort of detected a triple negative in there:
The :D tricked me into thinking "just kidding about the just kidding about the just kidding".
:( :duh:
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Rik said:
Bugger Netscape lost it :!(

Right:

Derbyshire: Cork, Dean, Welch
Durham: Harmison, Killeen, Wells (Hamilton if he starts bowling again bowls)
Essex: Cowan, Clarke, Stephenson (Irani if he can bowl)
Glamorgan: Jones, Thomas, Davies
Gloucestershire: Smith, Lewis, Averis, Alleyne
Hampshire: Mullally, Tremlett, Taylor, Morris (untill recently Giddins)
Kent: Saggers, Trott, Sheriyar, Hewitt
Lancashire: Chapple, Martin, Anderson, Hogg, Flintoff, Wood
Leicestershire: DeFreitas, Dagnall, Maddy, Grove, Masters
Middlesex: Gannon, Cook, Bloomfield, Hutchinson, Betts
Northants: Anderson (Rikki), Baker, Cousins, Greenidge, Cawdron, Phillips
Notts: Franks, Logan, Sidebottom, Shreck, Harris
Somerset: Caddick, Johnson, Jones, Laraman, Tucker, Andrew, Francais (until recently Bulbeck)
Surrey: Bicknell, Clarke, Ormond, Tudor, Murtagh, Sampson, (occasionally Hollioake, Butcher)
Sussex: Kirtley, Lewry, Martin-Jenkins, Robinson, Yardy
Warwickshire: Brown, Richardson, Sheikh, Wagg
Worcestershire: Ali, Liptrot, Leatherdale, Malik
Yorkshire: Gough, Hoggard, Kirby, Silverwood, White (if he bowls), McGrath

Not a single overseas or EU passport player there. I certainly think Yorkshire at full strength have a stronger all-round seam attack than England. Maybe I was being a bit extravigant but a lot of these teams have players who have performed better than the England seamers and I'm pretty sure couldn't do worse.
The really sad thing is there are lots of bowlers who I would say have real potential in there but still average 30 or close to.
There are, naturally, some donkeys too (the whole Northants lot, Wagg, Malik, Andrew, Shreck, Grove, Trott, Davies, to name a few).
And assuming you're talking last season, because Morris, Leatherdale and Robinson have retired.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Sorry to get this thread back on topic (;)) but apparently Bret Lee has requested help from Dennis Lillee regarding his bowling.
 

mavric41

State Vice-Captain
Jono said:
Sorry to get this thread back on topic (;)) but apparently Bret Lee has requested help from Dennis Lillee regarding his bowling.
Lee is flying Lillee out from Perth (with his own money) to help him.

Lillee is a miracle worker but even he will have his hands full.
 

SquidAU

First Class Debutant
Brett Lee had some bad luck in the Sydney test and so he gets flogged around the park....but I also would lose confidence form the fact that I missed out on wickets because of no balls and poor catching!

I think he put pressure on himself to perform because there was no Glen McGrath to back him up and he had to be the wicket taker, so to speak. So, he screwed up....everyone does!
 

Rik

Cricketer Of The Year
Richard said:
The really sad thing is there are lots of bowlers who I would say have real potential in there but still average 30 or close to.
There are, naturally, some donkeys too (the whole Northants lot, Wagg, Malik, Andrew, Shreck, Grove, Trott, Davies, to name a few).
And assuming you're talking last season, because Morris, Leatherdale and Robinson have retired.
I didn't take retirements into account, since Cricinfo hasn't updated teams yet, but I tried to remember all the player movements. As for Leatherdale, I was at his benefit game against Condover not that long ago, d'oh!

Rikki Anderson of Northants, I wouldn't count him as a donkey, just inconsistant, and exciting and talented to boot. Darren Cousins is a fine bowler whenever he's not injured. Andrew is a youngster, as is Malik and Wagg, far too early to judge them. Shreck just had his 1st season of CC after playing in Minor Counties, pretty big step up, shown promise. Trott had a good 2001, but has been injured in the last few years and struggled to get a place due to signings like Sheriyar taking his place.

As for the comment about averaging 30, out of the players I mentioned, and excluding the mainly part-time seamers in that list, off the top of my head there are at most 15 players who average 30 or more, and they are mainly backup seamers.

Players like Kevin Dean (Derbyshire) and Jon Lewis (Gloucestershire) are dangerously under-rated and constantly ignored.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Too early to judge the definate potential of the like of Wagg, Malik and Andrew, yes, but suffice it to say they're all totally rubbish ATM.
I've never really rated Anderson, occasional good performance but he's been playing for ages now and never really been consistent.
Dean and Lewis have good averages and are far better than most people seem to think, but their economy-rates always disappoint me.
Some people might say I set too high standards but I find it dangerous also to look at average alone - economy-rate always plays a part, and very, very few bowlers average under 27 and economy out at under 3.
For me this is a neccesity for the step-up to be a likelihood.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
SquidAU said:
Brett Lee had some bad luck in the Sydney test and so he gets flogged around the park....but I also would lose confidence form the fact that I missed out on wickets because of no balls and poor catching!

I think he put pressure on himself to perform because there was no Glen McGrath to back him up and he had to be the wicket taker, so to speak. So, he screwed up....everyone does!
Yes, he missed-out on three dismissals due to bad luck (all of the same batsman) but in no way can wickets off no-balls be construed as unlucky for the bowler.:!(
If it were just something that had happened in one Test all these attempted excuses would be fine, but the fact is, this Test is just a slight amplification of the last 3 years. Lee is useless and this has been proven more emphatically than usual in the most recent Test.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Richard said:
Yes, he missed-out on three dismissals due to bad luck (all of the same batsman) but in no way can wickets off no-balls be construed as unlucky for the bowler.:!(
Unless it's for 3 men behind Square on the Legside (not that this one was!)
 

Rik

Cricketer Of The Year
SquidAU said:
Brett Lee bowled well today IMO.....1/28 off 10...alot better
Strange, Cricinfo says it's 10-1-29-1.

He doesn't seem to be anywhere near the bowler he was a few months ago, the Tests against India have definately dented his confidence because against a team that weak, you would expect more than just 1 wicket. Also I wouldn't read too much into the econ, he mainly bowled to Dion Ebrahim and Grant Flower, the 2 most defensive Zimbabwean batsmen.
 

Linda

International Vice-Captain
No one else got any more than 1 wicket either. Unless you count Hoggs runout as his wicket.
 

Top