Taking his wickets at over 30 a piece ain't great if you ask me.
Also Shane Watson's done ok but as Rich has said a lot of his wickets have come in the slog overs where most of the time all you have to do is bowl straight. He's improving but still I'm not sure if he'll still be here in a few year's time.
Oh please, don't tell this me that this is coming from one of the very people who defended James Anderson and derided people for not giving enough credit to him for his bowling performance.........say it isn't so............
Dude, give some credit will you? You quote his average of 30 for the 5 matches he played before last night but forget that with yesterday's figures factored in, his average dipped to 26, not to mention that his wickets have come at just over 19 in his last 4 games. But disregarding stats, he has bowled exceptionally well. I mean, considering the Sri Lankan's are up there with the very best players of spin (particularly wrist-spin) in the world, for Brad Hogg to beat these guys with his wrong-un says a lot for how he's bowling at the moment.
As for Shane Watson, to dismiss his wickets as 'only coming in the slog overs' is at best insulting to him and at worst completely wrong.
Cases in point (I'm only counting he matches in which he's taken wickets, as this is the variable in question):
http://www-aus.cricket.org/link_to_...BS/SCORECARDS/AUS_ENG_VBS_ODI2_15DEC2002.html
1/31: Nick Knight in the 25th over.
http://www-aus.cricket.org/link_to_...VBS/SCORECARDS/AUS_SL_VBS_ODI5_22DEC2002.html
3/27: K Sangakkara in the 37th over; R Kaluwitharana 41st over, P Gunaratne 43rd over.
- Sri Lanka had already lost the game by that point so they were hardly trying to slog in trying for a higher total or to beat Australia. They were actually batting quite slowly at that point.
http://www-aus.cricket.org/link_to_...VBS/SCORECARDS/AUS_SL_VBS_ODI6_09JAN2003.html
2/72: S Jayasuriya in the 34th over; A de Silva in the 38th over.
http://www-aus.cricket.org/link_to_...BS/SCORECARDS/AUS_ENG_VBS_ODI7_11JAN2003.html
2/36: Stewart in the 48th over; Hussain in the 50th over.
- This is the only time you could say with any conviction that he'd got wickets when the batsmen were looking to 'slog'. That said, he'd bowled very well until that point and bowled well to prevent England winning what should have been a canter for them. Everyone WHO ACTUALLY SAW THE GAME thought he bowled well and I didn't hear one commentator say the wickets were only due to the batsmen going for the slog. I know you can't see the games live but if you had, maybe your impression would be different.
http://www-aus.cricket.org/link_to_...S/SCORECARDS/AUS_ENG_VBS_ODI11_19JAN2003.html
2/18: Stewart in the 23rd over; Blackwell in the 25th.
So give a little credit when it's due, eh? I mean, you complained when people didn't do the same for Anderson and when people seemed to be only looking for negatives, right?
Pot. Kettle. Black.
Not even the harshest critic can deny that Hogg and Watson are big parts as to why Australia is in the sucessful position they are right now in this series. And this is disregarding Watson's batting in the series too, which has been exactly what's been asked of him.
Oh and check your facts next time.