• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Battle of The Spinners

a massive zebra

International Captain
O'Reilly by a mile. Grimmett is overrated like many other Australian bowlers.

O'Reilly was almost universally recognised as the best of the two by contemporaries, and Grimmett was far less successful against the very best team of the time, England.

O'Reilly v England 19 7864 2587 102 7/54 25.36 1.97 77.0 8 3
Grimmett v England 22 9164 3439 106 6/37 32.44 2.25 86.4 11 2

This is what a leading 1930s journalist said shortly before he died in the early 80s:

``Grimmett was a short man who bowled with a low action, halfway to roundarm, which helped conceal the googly as you don't have to bend the wrist so far with a low action. He gave the ball plenty of air and spun it a lot, getting a great deal of movement off the pitch. However, his Test figures may be flattering as I think that, like Titch Freeman, he took advantage of the weaker teams and tail-enders contributed a lot to the total of his victims.''

``O'Reilly was unquestionably the greater bowler, and I am sure was the more feared by top class batsmen. He bowled a genuine medium pace, with an occasional fast-medium. He didn't turn the ball as much as Grimmett, but enough to beat the bat. His long loping run-up and general demeanour were the very picture of hostility, though he never descended to the level of bad temper and abuse of Lillee or Holding. Laker may have been the best spinner of all on a wicket that suited him but not otherwise.''
 
Last edited:

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
Tiger.

Good post Massive Zebra, I've read a few similar accounts that claim Grimmett's figures and reputation are both boosted by his phenomenal record against WI and SA, the minnows of the time.
 

chaminda_00

Hall of Fame Member
Sorry about the delay guys, lets finish this off well.

Semi Final One

Anil Kumble (LS)
111 Tests, 538 wkts @ 28.59, 33 5-fers, 8 10-fers, 65.09 SR, 2.63 ER



Bill O'Reilly (LS)
27 Tests, 144 wkts @ 22.59, 11 5-fers, 3 10-fers, 69.81 SR, 1.94 ER

 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Has be be O'Reilly I suppose. Harsh on Kumble, but Tiger was probably the best of his era & Anil certainly is no higher than third amongst his peers.
 

Top