chaminda_00
Hall of Fame Member
UPDATE: Laker 4, Saqlain 2
A bit disappointed with the low number of voters
A bit disappointed with the low number of voters
193 wickets @ <22 suggests otherwise tbhJBH001 said:Always thought Laker was overated - something of a one match and one series pony.
Saqqy for me.
Yes, I know.GeraintIsMyHero said:193 wickets @ <22 suggests otherwise tbh
EDIT - yes, I'm voting Laker
His average excluding that phenomenal series is still better than Warne's career average.JBH001 said:Yes, I know.
But take out that one great series and his figures though good, are not great.
Especially when you consider the wickets he was playing on - generally very helpful.
Don't get me wrong, I rate Laker and think he was very good, if just a tad overated.
Yes, I know.a massive zebra said:His average excluding that phenomenal series is still better than Warne's career average.