• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Battle of the Legends

adharcric

International Coach
aussie tragic said:
Don't think either of them have true legendary status as per the criteria specified, however I'll go Ponsford as the better of the two
Is there anything you think I should add to the criteria?
 

aussie tragic

International Captain
adharcric said:
Is there anything you think I should add to the criteria?
No, IMO you should have just let in 64 or 96 max, but this has already been discussed 8-)

Sorry, promise I'll not give anymore complaints, and as found in the Era XI threads, I know you can't please everybody :)
 

pasag

RTDAS
AT, if they aren't legends then they will be voted out early, I don't see a problem with too many entries.
 

aussie tragic

International Captain
pasag said:
AT, if they aren't legends then they will be voted out early, I don't see a problem with too many entries.
ok, I'm just fuming because Rod Marsh and Merv Hughes didn't make the list of 128 :@

btw, Rod Marsh did set up the Australian and England cricket academies (and now Aussie and Eng are number 1 and 2 respectively), while Merv is an Aussie selector and anyone who saw the crowd imitating his every move at the MCG would have no hesitation in stating he's a legend ;)
 
Last edited:

adharcric

International Coach
Preliminary Round, Battle 5

We shall define a legend of cricket on the basis of the following criteria:

- An influential figure who made a significant impact on the way the game is played on the field.
- An influential figure who remained involved in and made significant contributions to the game off the field.
- A hero or an icon who served as an inspiration for others (cricketers as well as the general public) and will be remembered for years to come.
- Remember that a legend is defined not merely by cricket records but also by aura, impact and legacy.


Wasim Akram (left-arm fast bowler, one of only two bowlers to take 400 wickets in both forms of the game)



Wes Hall (fast bowler, among the earliest in the succession of terrorising WI pacemen, later a selector and manager)



This battle will close after 6 hours (or earlier if it's one-sided IMO) with a lead of at least 5. Otherwise, it will close after 12 hours.
 
Last edited:

oz_fan

International Regular
I'm going to go with Akram. I think Hall is sometimes forgotten amongst the WI pacemen (Marshall, Ambrose, Holding, etc) where as Akram is often considered by many as the greatest left-arm pace bowler of all time.
 

archie mac

International Coach
silentstriker said:
Akram, ahead of Davidson as the greatest left arm seamer of all time.

It would be very close, Davidson did not play as many Tests, and was relegated to third change after Miller and Lindwall for the early part of his career.

I remember reading his bio where he wrote that in 1956 they tried to turn him into an off spinner to combat Laker and Lock
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
archie mac said:
It would be very close, Davidson did not play as many Tests, and was relegated to third change after Miller and Lindwall for the early part of his career.

I remember reading his bio where he wrote that in 1956 they tried to turn him into an off spinner to combat Laker and Lock
Very interesting, that implies he may not have been as good as his stats would suggest. I only have a very surface knowledge of him, from reading Benaud's books where he mentioned Davidson. He rates him as a good, but not an all time great player. And since I read Benaud more than anyone else, my opinions kind of mirror his on a lot of subjects. However, for a while Benaud did say that on his day he was unplayable.
 

archie mac

International Coach
silentstriker said:
Very interesting, that implies he may not have been as good as his stats would suggest. I only have a very surface knowledge of him, from reading Benaud's books where he mentioned Davidson. He rates him as a good, but not an all time great player. And since I read Benaud more than anyone else, my opinions kind of mirror his on a lot of subjects. However, for a while Benaud did say that on his day he was unplayable.
I must admit Benaud (the writer) bores me to tears:-O

Okay I will have Hall
 

Top