Yeah, but that's all there was in the 1870s. Grace's test record isn't bad by the standards of the time, but his first class record when it was the highest level of competition available in world cricket was extremely good. He was the best batsman in world cricket by a huge margin. It's simply not a case of someone with a poor record having a strong reputation - his reputation was built on being a dominant runscorer. Nobody else was averaging 70+ on the sorts of wickets he played on.chaminda_00 said:I don't look that closely at FC records, even Ashley Giles has a good FC record.
Good call to all those who chose Procter. so who's next?adharcric said:Preliminary Battle, Round 1: Procter 8, James 3
96 would be ideal but cutting down involves additional complications; had I gotten additional input on who should be removed, I would have gone with that option.JBH001 said:Crap, 128 names? Why so many?
Adharcric you should have had the balls to just chop it to 64, or 96 at the least.
Yeah, fair play mate - I can see where you are coming from.adharcric said:96 would be ideal but cutting down involves additional complications; had I gotten additional input on who should be removed, I would have gone with that option. Otherwise, I have to apply my own subjection and people may consider that biased. Anyways, each battle in this round will last 6-12 hours so we should be through it pretty soon.