• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Battle of the Footballers

BoyBrumby

Englishman
It's another tough one this, but I think I'll go with Garrincha. Sixty international caps & only one defeat (when Hungary kicked lumps out of Brazil in '66, it's actually shocking to see. If today's standards of reffing had've been applied Hungary would ended up with about 3 men left on the pitch) he turned a physical deformity (one leg two inches shorter than the other) in to a positive attribute. It totally crippled his hips in later life, but what a step he had.
 

Barney Rubble

International Coach
marc71178 said:
Zidane beaten :D
Indeed. :)

Round 1 Matchup 7

Alan Shearer (England)


Luis Figo (Portugal)


Already through:
George Weah
Ruud Krol
Marco van Basten
Pele
Franz Beckenbauer
Garrincha
 
Last edited:

BoyBrumby

Englishman
It's very tempting to vote for Wallsend's king of the elbow, he is the best centre-forward we've produced in England in the last fifteen years by a comfortable distance, but I think Figo is the more gifted player & has certainly won more at a domestic level than Sir Alan. So it's

Luis Figo for me
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
BoyBrumby said:
It's very tempting to vote for Wallsend's king of the elbow, he is the best centre-forward we've produced in England in the last fifteen years by a comfortable distance, but I think Figo is the more gifted player & has certainly won more at a domestic level than Sir Alan. So it's

Luis Figo for me

What does that have to do with anything? Figo played in better teams, Shearer was the main factor by a considerable distance in Blackburn winning the league - without him they'd have been midtable.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Scaly piscine said:
What does that have to do with anything? Figo played in better teams, Shearer was the main factor by a considerable distance in Blackburn winning the league - without him they'd have been midtable.
The point I'm making is that neither has won anything with their respective countries, so when one looks at the level below that it becomes apparent that Figo has been more successful.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
BoyBrumby said:
The point I'm making is that neither has won anything with their respective countries, so when one looks at the level below that it becomes apparent that Figo has been more successful.
Team success is still irrelevant. Is someone like Crespo better than Rooney because Crespo has won more stuff than Rooney? Not in a million years.

What they've done individually to enhance team success is relevant.
 

Cloete

International Captain
Scaly piscine said:
Team success is still irrelevant. Is someone like Crespo better than Rooney because Crespo has won more stuff than Rooney? Not in a million years.

What they've done individually to enhance team success is relevant.
Exactly, and in this case Figo has done alot more to enhance that. Mainly due to the fact that he's a better player.

It's obvious who alot of the regular English contingency are going to vote for though.
 

Top