-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Battle of the CricketWeb Selectors
- Thread starter Nate
- Start date
LongHopCassidy
International Captain
England - pace attack: Goughy
NZTailender
I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Perm said:
Agreed!
Goughy
Hall of Fame Member
Rather be nominated for SA TBH though any nom is an honourMatt79 said:Australia: Archie Mac
India: SJS, Jono, Silent Striker (he'll sort those pace bowlers out)
England: Goughy, Geraint-IMH,
NZ: James (suck up!)
RSA: Langeveldt
I know the SA scene in far more detail than I do the English ATM. Also there is a lack of Saffies on this board so Im unlikely to get sacked. Gotta think of the career and pension
Turbinator
Cricketer Of The Year
This man really badly wants to be a selector, and none of you are responding to the poor guy, just tell him that he can't be a selector.TIF said:
shortpitched713
International Captain
We could just have them select teams before each tour/match.Xuhaib said:100+ posts and nobody has an idea what to do
Nate
You'll Never Walk Alone
Become an ***OFFICIAL*** CricketWeb Selector
The Point - To find out who CricketWeb believes to be the most knowledgable and street-smart in point of selection. We're aiming to have three selectors for each country.
The Criteria - Nominees should be active in their knowledge and passion of nominated country. The nominee does not have to live in or have been born in that country. Voting should be based on your observations of member's posts in relevant threads and if not, valid reasoning should be given. Nominees shouldn't neccessarily agree with the "norm", but a willingness to cooperate with other selectors should have influence. Indeed, in countries which have struggling cricket teams, perhaps a unique view would be more crucial in decision making.
The Rules - Members must be nominated, seconded and thirded. You can not nominate, second or third yourself. When we have enough nominees, we will have a final vote for each country, one country at a time. You can nominate as many people as you'd like. You may nominate someone for multiple countries, but they will ultimately only be chosen to represent one side. Nominees must accept their status before they will be entered into a final ballot.
The Result - When the selectors have been voted in, they will be required to make decisions individually, but ultimately as a squad, in regards to an upcoming tour. After the tour has taken place, we can see how well they predicted and in time, selectors may be voted out and in.
SJS (India) (1st)
Mr Mxyzptlk (West Indies) (1st)
Mister Wright (Australia) (1st)
Prince EWS (Australia, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe) (1st)
silentstriker (India) (1st)
pasag (Australia) (1st)
Jono (India) (1st)
chaminda_00 (Sri Lanka) (1st)
NZTailender (New Zealand) (1st)
adharcric (India) (1st)
Turbinator (India) (1st)
Also, if a moderator could change the title of this thread to 'Battle of the CricketWeb Selectors', that'd be great.
Cheers SS.
The Point - To find out who CricketWeb believes to be the most knowledgable and street-smart in point of selection. We're aiming to have three selectors for each country.
The Criteria - Nominees should be active in their knowledge and passion of nominated country. The nominee does not have to live in or have been born in that country. Voting should be based on your observations of member's posts in relevant threads and if not, valid reasoning should be given. Nominees shouldn't neccessarily agree with the "norm", but a willingness to cooperate with other selectors should have influence. Indeed, in countries which have struggling cricket teams, perhaps a unique view would be more crucial in decision making.
The Rules - Members must be nominated, seconded and thirded. You can not nominate, second or third yourself. When we have enough nominees, we will have a final vote for each country, one country at a time. You can nominate as many people as you'd like. You may nominate someone for multiple countries, but they will ultimately only be chosen to represent one side. Nominees must accept their status before they will be entered into a final ballot.
The Result - When the selectors have been voted in, they will be required to make decisions individually, but ultimately as a squad, in regards to an upcoming tour. After the tour has taken place, we can see how well they predicted and in time, selectors may be voted out and in.
SJS (India) (1st)
Mr Mxyzptlk (West Indies) (1st)
Mister Wright (Australia) (1st)
Prince EWS (Australia, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe) (1st)
silentstriker (India) (1st)
pasag (Australia) (1st)
Jono (India) (1st)
chaminda_00 (Sri Lanka) (1st)
NZTailender (New Zealand) (1st)
adharcric (India) (1st)
Turbinator (India) (1st)
Also, if a moderator could change the title of this thread to 'Battle of the CricketWeb Selectors', that'd be great.
Cheers SS.
Last edited: