Battle of the Cricketers

[Burpey]

Keith Miller

 

[Clarence]

Dravid.

Think when all the dust settles he'll be second only to Sir Donald as batsmen go.

hahaha! Eat one.

 

[Dasa]

Dravid.

 

[honestbharani]

Miller. I tend to rate all rounders a bit more than specialists when it comes to rating them AS CRICKETERS. Pity about Dravid, one of the all time greats, though.

 

[King_Ponting]

Miller...

 

[FaaipDeOiad]

Miller, but Dravid is unlucky.

 

[age_master]

Miller, Dravid unlucky to draw one of the best all rounders ever

 

[The Baconator]

Miller

 

[Jamee999]

11-2 to Miller and the Aussie goes through.

ROUND ONE ----- ----- MATCHUP EIGHT

So here we go with the last battle of the first quarter, and its 2 West Indian pace experts facing off.

CEL Ambrose (West Indies) (LHB, RF)

(apologies for big picture)


MD Marshall (West Indies) (RHB, RFM)

 

[Magrat Garlick]

Marshall.

 

[Anil]

marshall

 

[Pothas]

marshall

 

[BoyBrumby]

Desperately unfair on big Curtley, but Marshall for me too. He was some bowler.

 

[Barney Rubble]

Marshall, but if all these big names keep getting drawn together someone rubbish is going to get quite far!

 

[age_master]

Marshall, but if all these big names keep getting drawn together someone rubbish is going to get quite far!

agreed

Marshall for me too

 

[archie mac]

Both great bowlers, Marshall had better support for longer, but was a good batsman.

So Marshall for me

 

[gio]

Ambrose. Loved his style of bowling.

 

[Dasa]

Marshall.

 

[FaaipDeOiad]

Ambrose for me, definately.

 

[Zinzan]

Marshall for me marginally - definately the 2 best W.I quicks IMO