Battle of the Cricketers

[Burpey]

Headley

 

[Jamee999]

Votes on CRICKETING ABILITY not if you like them, please

 

[Pothas]

wel it doesnt really matter when it comes too this match does it

 

[Jamee999]

No, but comments like Headley cuz Kallis is a tit and stuff. Is not good.

 

[Jamee999]

20-1 to Headley!!!

ROUND ONE ----- ----- MATCH UP ELEVEN
Big clash here, 2 great Pakistani bowlers (who could hold a bat) facing off.

Imran Khan (Pakistan) (RHB, RF)

Wasim Akram (Pakistan) (LHB, LF)

 

[steds]

Wasim

 

[The Baconator]

2 Pakistani legends, wasim the better bowler, Imran the better batter and IMO the better cricketer so Imran Khan gets my vote.

 

[Armadillo]

its a toughie, imran

 

[BoyBrumby]

Imran for me. Very close as bowlers, Wasim's peak probably slightly longer, but Imran def the better batter.

 

[Pothas]

Imran Kahn

 

[superkingdave]

Wasim

 

[archie mac]

Why, did he hate Catholics and have a questionable war record too? Gee, it almost makes me want to vote for Kallis...almost.

Headley.

Since Chuck Fleetwood-Smith (Catholic) was one of his closest Cricketing mates, and Bradman joined the Air Force at the very start of the war, and was later invalided out, I am not really sure of your point?

 

[age_master]

Imran for me too

 

[marc71178]

Personally Imran by a country mile.

 

[Anil]

imran khan

 

[Scaly piscine]

No, but comments like Headley cuz Kallis is a tit and stuff. Is not good.

It was obvious Headley was miles better anyway and as many people will know I like to slag off that selfish saffie tit with red ink fever whenever the opportunity presents itself.

 

[FaaipDeOiad]

Imran marginally.

 

[C_C]

Imran Khan

 

[Majin]

WASIM AKRAM!!/twelvth man

I don't know how the hell to spell 12th.

 

[honestbharani]

Imran. He was an allrounder and thus, the better CRICKETER of the two. Plus he was a better captain than Wasim. So, even though it may sound harsh, this is a no contest as far as I am concerned.